Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> OK, so that makes sense. What I see happening is creation of a
> journal file when i do the update/insert/delete statement each of
> which return SQLITE_OK. However, nothing is visible from an outside
> process (like sqlite3). If I understand you, th
OK, so that makes sense. What I see happening is creation of a journal file
when i do the update/insert/delete statement each of which return SQLITE_OK.
However, nothing is visible from an outside process (like sqlite3). If I
understand you, this journal will be applied once the sqlite3_st
"Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm running the 3.5.7 version now. My understanding was that if I
> have a prepared statement and currently using sqlite_step to walk
> through the results, the database was unable to commit a write.
You cannot commit a
I'm running the 3.5.7 version now. My understanding was that if I have a
prepared statement and currently using sqlite_step to walk through the results,
the database was unable to commit a write.
In my case, I would be using the same connection. Would you explain more?
Also, what if same conn
"Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm in a loop processing the result set using sqlite3_step. I need to
> insert/update the same sqlite database but a different table. I
> can't get the write lock while I have this active statement I'm using
> sqlite3_st
Hi,
Does anyone on the list use the sqlite3 gem with Ruby? Is this list ok to post
sqlite/ruby questions?
Many thanks in advance
Mike
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
__
Hi,
I'm in a loop processing the result set using sqlite3_step. I need to
insert/update the same sqlite database but a different table. I can't get the
write lock while I have this active statement I'm using sqlite3_step to move
through.
I'm sure this is pretty common so what's the conventio
7 matches
Mail list logo
