Re: [sqlite] incredibly minor documentation bug

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:30 PM, George Collins wrote: > > "If X is the integer -9223372036854775807 then abs(X) throws an integer > overflow error since there is no equivalent positive 64-bit two complement > value." > > It's off by one: X is actually

[sqlite] incredibly minor documentation bug

Don't ask me what use case made me notice this, but the http://www.sqlite.org/lang_corefunc.html documentation for abs(), as of 12:29PM EDT on 10/26/2013, is only about 99.89157978275145% accurate. "If X is the integer -9223372036854775807 then abs(X) throws an integer overflow