Re: [sqlite] progress handler code changed 3.4.0

"John Belli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the progress handler returns non-zero, sqlite_exec is returning > SQLITE_INTERRUPT instead of SQLITE_ABORT. Was this intentional? The > comment says SQLITE_ABORT, but the return is being set to > SQLITE_INTERRUPT. > (vdbe.c line 553) > This change is

[sqlite] progress handler code changed 3.4.0

If the progress handler returns non-zero, sqlite_exec is returning SQLITE_INTERRUPT instead of SQLITE_ABORT. Was this intentional? The comment says SQLITE_ABORT, but the return is being set to SQLITE_INTERRUPT. (vdbe.c line 553) JAB