Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread Vania Smrkovski
Thank you all so much for your data. It will really help me a lot. Looks like I'll be able to use SQLite in ways I had originally anticipated would be out of scope. Well done On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 09:06, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > Over the past 30 days, the www.

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread Jay Macaulay
> More data: > > I duplicated the www.sqlite.org website on my desktop then started > hammering on it using multiple instances of "wget -r". I ran the > test for several minutes. > > During this test, every hit involved multiple SELECTs and at least > one UPDATE against a single sqlite database fi

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread D. Richard Hipp
Richard Heyes wrote: During this test, every hit involved multiple SELECTs and at least one UPDATE against a single sqlite database file. The database engine was easily able to handle a rate of over 250 (2.5M) hits/day or about 30 hits/second. The database did not appear to be the limiting fa

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread Richard Heyes
> During this test, every hit involved multiple SELECTs and at least > one UPDATE against a single sqlite database file. The database engine > was easily able to handle a rate of over 250 (2.5M) hits/day or > about 30 hits/second. The database did not appear to be the limiting > factor in thi

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread D. Richard Hipp
D. Richard Hipp wrote: Over the past 30 days, the www.sqlite.org website has seen 6 separate 10-minute bursts of activity with 25 hits/day rates and many 1-minute bursts in the 45 hits/day range. Rates in excess of 20 hits/day have been sustained for a couple of hours on one event. (M

RE: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread Allan Edwards
-Original Message- From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 7:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > The www.sqlite.org website is run off of a single SQLite database. > Back

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread D. Richard Hipp
D. Richard Hipp wrote: The www.sqlite.org website is run off of a single SQLite database. Back before I implemented bandwidth throttling, the site would sometimes get 5 hits/day to pages that used the database. Over the past 30 days, the www.sqlite.org website has seen 6 separate 10-minute burs

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread D. Richard Hipp
Vania Smrkovski wrote: Have you or anyone encountered issues regarding my other questions, that of using SQLite as a web-served DB system? How do the recently discussed issues of concurrency and the locking of DB tables and files affect the use of a web site delivered SQLite DB system, and is the

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-24 Thread Vania Smrkovski
Darren, Thanks for the response. I knew about this issue as a security hole, which is why one of my options was to place the DB files out of the entire web doc tree. Happily, you took something that I had to learn the hard way from tech notes and experience and codified it in a way that c

Re: [sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-23 Thread Darren Duncan
At 9:04 PM -0500 11/23/03, Vania Smrkovski wrote: > Speaking to the first question, regarding security of data, aside from >some of the obvious, like putting the DB files out of the web document >tree, are there any ways to configure SQLite to keep the DB files in >some non-readable format?

[sqlite] web server use of SQLite

2003-11-23 Thread Vania Smrkovski
Hello, I became acquainted to SQLite through its implementation in the upcoming PHP version 5.0. As such, it is taking on much the same role that MySQL used to in versions up to the current official release (still in the 4.x range). As I understand it, one of the primary reasons is MySQL'