-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2010 07:22 PM, Sam Carleton wrote:
> I did this search:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=sqlite+text+search
Thanks. I have updated the relevant wiki pages to say the information is
old and to point to the current FTS3 implementation.
> m
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Sam Carleton
wrote:
> Roger,
>
> I did this search:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=sqlite+text+search
>
> The top link points here:
>
> http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=FullTextIndex
>
> Thus I learned of FTS1 and FTS2, maybe things should be configured so
Roger,
I did this search:
http://www.google.com/search?q=sqlite+text+search
The top link points here:
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=FullTextIndex
Thus I learned of FTS1 and FTS2, maybe things should be configured so that
CVS isn't crawled by search engines ;)
Sam
On Wed, May 26, 2010
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/26/2010 10:24 AM, Sam Carleton wrote:
>> If I do opt to use FTS, which one should I be using, FTS1 or FTS2?
>> According to the web site, it should be FTS1, correct?
>
> Just as a matter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2010 10:24 AM, Sam Carleton wrote:
> If I do opt to use FTS, which one should I be using, FTS1 or FTS2?
> According to the web site, it should be FTS1, correct?
Just as a matter of interest what part of the web site led you to those
conclusio
2:25 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] FTS1 or FTS2
On 26 May 2010, at 6:24pm, Sam Carleton wrote:
> 212-456-7890
> 212-789-1234
> 212-564-9875
> 212-357-8452
> 212-285-6100
> 560-851-5522
>
> If searching for a number with '56', I
On 26 May 2010, at 6:24pm, Sam Carleton wrote:
> 212-456-7890
> 212-789-1234
> 212-564-9875
> 212-357-8452
> 212-285-6100
> 560-851-5522
>
> If searching for a number with '56', I want to get back: 212-4*56*-7890,
> 212-*56*4-9875, and *56*0-851-5522, NOT 212-28*5-6*100. Is FTS the right
> answ
7 matches
Mail list logo