e] In-memory DB performance tuning
>
>
> Thanks for the quick response. Any samples that I can reference?
>
> -Arthur
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim McDaniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 00:55, Arthur C. Hsu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an in-memory DB and try to perform inserts to tables inside. Seems
> that there are some performance bottlenecks for continuous inserts. The row
> insertion speed will drop dramatically after the first 6000 rows are
> inserted
Thanks for the quick response. Any samples that I can reference?
-Arthur
-Original Message-
From: Tim McDaniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sqlite] In-memory DB performance tuning
Arthur,
I've just done
-Original Message-
> From: Arthur C. Hsu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:16 AM
> To: 'Steve Dekorte'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [sqlite] In-memory DB performance tuning
>
>
> Yes I know the Berkeley DB o
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sqlite] In-memory DB performance tuning
On Nov 17, 2003, at 9:55 PM, Arthur C. Hsu wrote:
> Any clues that I can further squeeze the performance? Or the
> limitation is by design? I just can't realize why the first 6000 rows
> are amazing fast
On Nov 17, 2003, at 9:55 PM, Arthur C. Hsu wrote:
Any clues that I can further squeeze the performance? Or the
limitation is
by design? I just can't realize why the first 6000 rows are amazing
fast
but later the speed drops down so dramatically.
Hi Arthur,
If you really need performance and ca
6 matches
Mail list logo
