Christian Smith wrote:
> No, because *every single* write to that handle will involve a sync to the
> underlying device! That would decimate performance.
> Using a single FlushFileBuffers batches multiple write's in a single sync
> operation.
> That this hurts performance on Windows says more
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Ludvig Strigeus wrote:
>Link:
>http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid5_gci920473,00.html
>
>Quote: "FlushFileBuffers is an API call that forces all data for an open
>file handle to be flushed from the system cache and also sends a command to
>the disk to flush
2 matches
Mail list logo
