On 25 Jun 2010, at 7:06pm, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 06/24/10 05:13 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> I see. You are building from the amalgamation. And you should be too. But
>> you are right - we do not ship test suites with the amalgamation. To use
>> the free test suite for SQLite, you hav
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 06/24/10 05:13 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> > I see. You are building from the amalgamation. And you should be too.
> But
> > you are right - we do not ship test suites with the amalgamation. To use
> > the free test suite for SQLite
On 06/24/10 05:13 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> I see. You are building from the amalgamation. And you should be too. But
> you are right - we do not ship test suites with the amalgamation. To use
> the free test suite for SQLite, you have to build from canonical source
> code. We have a separate
Does the TEA tarball have the tests?
--
__
3.14159265358979323846264338327950 Let the spirit of pi
2884197169399375105820974944592307 spread all over the world!
8164062862089986280348253421170679 http://pi314.at PI VOBISCUM!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2010 12:38 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> The test suite being AFAIK
> essentially an application that links against the already-compiled SQLite,
Not quite the case. The test suite includes large amounts of code to induce
various faults, track
Replying to an earlier post, I remember "make test" working for SQLite when I
tried it in the past. I'm actually used to running that, this practice
ingrained as standard behaviour with Perl and Perl modules, and I usually
expect
any other projects to have a "make test" too. Besides Perl, I k
On 06/24/10 05:13 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/24/10 04:20 PM, Black, Michael (IS) wrote:
>>> Try one directory up. It's not in the src directory Makefile.
>>
>>
>> There is only one directory - there is no 'src' directory at all
hat one is not free, I'm afraid.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Michael D. Black
> > Senior Scientist
> > Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
> >
> >
> > ________
> >
> > From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Dr
David Kirkby
> Sent: Thu 6/24/2010 10:10 AM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Why is there no test suite for ''make check' ?
>
>
>
> On 06/24/10 02:55 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Dr. Dav
on of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Why is there no test suite for ''make check' ?
On 06/24/10 02:55 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
>> I know the SQlite developers take testing quite seriously
>&
On 06/24/10 02:55 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
>> I know the SQlite developers take testing quite seriously
>>
>> http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html
>>
>> with 679 times as much test code as actual code in the database.
>>
>> In fact, I've o
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I know the SQlite developers take testing quite seriously
>
> http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html
>
> with 679 times as much test code as actual code in the database.
>
> In fact, I've often pointed to the above page when trying to get the
12 matches
Mail list logo
