Hi,
I need to optimize/speed up my 'select' queries. The query creates
about 3 to 6 left joins from 7 different tables depending on the
different conditions passed. The problem is that this is taking a lot
of time.
The table column's are of both varchar and integer types - on which
I have compilted tcl, but had a problem with tk. having compiled sqlite3 I
get a new error trying to run sqlite3 =
'sqlite3: error while loading shared libraries: libsqlite3.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or diretory'
Any Ideas?
Lloyd
- Original Message -
From:
Lloyd Thomas wrote:
I have compilted tcl, but had a problem with tk. having compiled sqlite3 I
get a new error trying to run sqlite3 =
'sqlite3: error while loading shared libraries: libsqlite3.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or diretory'
That seems a common problem
There does not seem to be a library file in /usr/lib/ called
libsqlite3.so.0. would that be the problem. Please bear with me I am a linux
newbie.
Lloyd
- Original Message -
From: Arjen Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 12:13 PM
Julien LEFORT wrote:
This looks like a great solution. Just another point,
what if I want to fill this ring buffer automatically by using triggers on
other tables, and be able to reset the counter of the ring buffer when I
arrive at the max integer value of the primary key.
--Create
Ritesh Kapoor wrote:
Hi,
I need to optimize/speed up my 'select' queries. The query creates
about 3 to 6 left joins from 7 different tables depending on the
different conditions passed. The problem is that this is taking a lot
of time.
The table column's are of both varchar and integer
Hi all.
I am new both to this list and sqlite. Great tool.
I apologize if the question is a bit stupid, but I searched the whole
site without being able to find answer.
How can I prevent this message box from popping up under Windows? I
would like sqlite3_exec fail silently and only report
Eddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I doing something wrong ?
Is it a know bug of sqlite3 ?
Please distinguish between SQLite the C library and sqlite the
command-line shell that you can use to access databases. We work
very hard to make sure that SQLite the C library is free of bugs.
But
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:47:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose you could argue that this is a bug in the command-line
shell. I won't contradict you. But being a monolingual american,
I have no clue how to reproduce the problem, much less fix it.
You just need to compensate for
I have an sqlite 2.1 format database file with records in it that
have been marked deleted (I believe the term for this is that their
pages are on the freelist)
Is there any simple way to get these records back? Or are they gone
forever?
Autovacuum was not on, and with a hex editor I can see
Sqlite 3.2.7 does not seem to perform a fairly straightforward database
optimization for queries
involving an ORDER BY clause with a LIMIT clause.
Given a table or view with a large number of rows, such as View1 below:
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 5, 6);
INSERT INTO t1
11 matches
Mail list logo