On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Rusty Conover wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get an estimate on the space used by an
existing index? If not what is a good guess on how to estimate the
size?
My guess would be (assuming text fields are being indexed):
[total length of all index keys] + [number of
Alexey Belyaev wrote:
Hi!
In current versions sqlite (3.2.7 and later) not enought functions,
for receive information abut free pages count (or used pages count).
I have to use not official methods :(
May I expect that this functions will be introduced in next versions sqlite?
I too
Hi Christian, thanks for the explanation, when you explain it like that it's
so simple, the index in the book concept didnt even come to me. lol.
John.
On 21/04/06, Christian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Rusty Conover wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get an
I mean freepages.c under not official methods :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-free-pages-count-t1485769.html#a4025820
Sent from the SQLite forum at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I want to use sqlite as database in Solaris Environment in Java based web
application. There can be multiple read only requests coming to database at
same time. I tried using javasqlite driver for using sqlite with Java but as
number of users or request increase response time increase
Hi,
I want to use sqlite as database in Solaris Environment in Java based web
application. There can be multiple read only requests coming to database at
same time. I tried using javasqlite driver for using sqlite with Java but as
number of users or request increase response time increase
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your immediate reply.
I will send you schema and query for which I feel there is problem.
On the other hand the driver I used for connection between java and sqlite
(javasqlite- http://www.ch-werner.de/javasqlite/) states that this driver is
tested only in Linux. I was
I will send you schema and query for which I feel there is problem.
On the other hand the driver I used for connection between java and sqlite
(javasqlite- http://www.ch-werner.de/javasqlite/) states that this driver is
tested only in Linux. I was wondering even if I should use SQLite with
On 4/20/06, Igor Tandetnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas Bastin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When trying to commit a transaction, I'm getting the following error
message from sqlite3_exec():
cannot commit transaction - SQL statements in progress
Is there any way to find out what
Is there any way to effectively prepare the following statement:
SELECT * FROM some_table WHERE id IN (?);
where the contents of the variable are a vector? (1,3,5,9,34,57), etc.
I've been building up these just using text and using exec, but it
seems you'd want to have a
Nicholas Bastin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any way to effectively prepare the following statement:
SELECT * FROM some_table WHERE id IN (?);
where the contents of the variable are a vector? (1,3,5,9,34,57), etc.
I've been building up these just using text and using exec, but it
seems
I've run into an issue where the reuse of a TCL array (to hold query
results) causes a catastrophic memory leak. The eval command is called
with the same array name again and again. Each successive query / array
population exponentially consumes more and more memory (until the system
crashes).
Alexey Belyaev wrote:
I mean freepages.c under not official methods :)
I know. :) I'm hoping that someday it will be officially supported. If
Dr. Hipp feels that it adds unnecessary bloat to the library, then maybe
it can be supported but IFDEFd out by default, and those of us that
want
Rusty Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get an estimate on the space used by an
existing index? If not what is a good guess on how to estimate the
size?
My guess would be (assuming text fields are being indexed):
[total length of all index keys] +
Aldobino Braga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've run into an issue where the reuse of a TCL array (to hold query
results) causes a catastrophic memory leak. The eval command is called
with the same array name again and again. Each successive query / array
population exponentially consumes more
I had a musing while reading:
http://news.com.com/2100-7344_3-6063599.html?part=rsstag=6063599subj=news
where it reminded me of one of MySQL's features:
MySQL's database is built so that it can use a range of different
storage mechanisms, tuned for different purposes, such as
16 matches
Mail list logo