Hello,
I'm on WinXP and using sqlite 3.7.4 with the CLI. I try to insert ~ 10,100,000
records into a schema with different tables (http://pastebin.com/cbsPHNEj). The
db file has already 1.9 GB when I start the INSERTs via
sqlite3 -bail extra.db3 inserts.sql
The statements in inserts.sql look
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
This is, technically, a compatibility break. On the other hand, there
appear to be vast numbers of smartphone applications that currently depend
on undefined behavior and will suddenly stop working if we don't make this
On 11 Jan 2011, at 8:00am, Oliver Peters wrote:
I'm on WinXP and using sqlite 3.7.4 with the CLI. I try to insert ~ 10,100,000
records into a schema with different tables
It that takes 11 hours, that means you're taking about 4ms per INSERT. I don't
know if this is unusually high. You
On 11 Jan 2011, at 08:20, Max Vlasov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
This is, technically, a compatibility break. On the other hand, there
appear to be vast numbers of smartphone applications that currently depend
on undefined behavior and
On 11 janv. 2011, at 01:54, Richard Hipp wrote:
So the question to you, gentle reader, is should we make this change, and
break backwards compatibility, albeit in a very obscure way, or should we be
hard-nosed and force hundreds or perhaps thousands of smartphone application
developers fix
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:54 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
This is, technically, a compatibility break.
But wasn't the original change also a compatibility break? But this time it
may make it into the short-form software history at
http://www.sqlite.org/changes.html?
Having studied the
I agree with this change because it doesn't change all well written
programs.
It just tries to correct all incorrectly written ones, which is a good thing
for the end-users.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Hi Richard,
I don't know if I have collected accurate and enough information for you,
please check and let me know.
As you said, I'm calling sqlite apis to add callbacks, without any kind of
changes to sourcecode. The routine I'm using:
1. implement my own separate function, let's say,
Hi,
The documentation mentions the possibility of joining a fts table with a
normal table via rowid.
(e.g. select sender, subject from email join email_text on email.rowid =
email_text.rowid where body match 'jam';)
Can this join only be done via the rowid field? I tried using an id field
(my
This is, technically, a compatibility break. On the other hand, there
appear to be vast numbers of smartphone applications that currently depend
on undefined behavior and will suddenly stop working if we don't make this
change.
I understand the proposed change will have no incidence for
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Jean-Christophe Deschamps
j...@q-e-d.orgwrote:
My rationale is that either it's technically or economically feasible
for the offending applications' developpers to change their code to use
the library correctly (and that doesn't seem to be the case), OR very
On 11 janv. 2011, at 13:15, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Jean-Christophe Deschamps
j...@q-e-d.orgwrote:
My rationale is that either it's technically or economically feasible
for the offending applications' developpers to change their code to use
the library
If you can change the API so correctly written apps don't break and poorly
written ones work too...yeah rah...
The only thing I would ask is a clear example of what correctly written
isdoes that exist? I can't find it in the documentataion. Plus, a clear
example of poorly written...but
On 11 Jan 2011, at 12:15, Richard Hipp wrote:
That new OS release includes the latest shared library for
SQLite.
You didn't put it there, and the consequences of putting it there are not your
responsibility. Nor are the consequences of someone else's app breaking because
they didn't read
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:35 PM, Jean-Denis Muys wrote:
Don't encumber SQLite with workarounds and special cases
to cater to bugs in client software.
Isn't an accurate synopsis of the problem this: that Sqlite has *already*
implemented a workaround in 3.7.0, and that this workaround has
On 11 Jan 2011, at 13:36, Andy Gibbs wrote:
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:35 PM, Jean-Denis Muys wrote:
Don't encumber SQLite with workarounds and special cases
to cater to bugs in client software.
Isn't an accurate synopsis of the problem this: that Sqlite has *already*
implemented a
Hello,
Simon Slavin slav...@... writes:
[...]
It that takes 11 hours, that means you're taking about 4ms per INSERT. I
don't know if this is unusually high.
You might like to try 'PRAGMA synchronous = OFF'
http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_synchronous
sqlite3 -bail extra.db3
I think that a bunch of good points have been made, especially as to why you
should hold your ground.
(I don't have sympathy for poor code that doesn't follow the documentation,
especially when there is a large, competent, and helpful community group
that usually comes to people's aid in less
An end user (think: your mom) wants to upgrade her smartphone to the
latest
OS release. That new OS release includes the latest shared library for
SQLite. But in so doing, some percentage of the apps she has downloaded
cease to work. Sure, the problem really is that the apps were incorrectly
Today only (Tues) O'Reilly is offering their Top 10 Database/SQL
Titles for 60% off ebooks and videos. Included in the group is
Using SQLite, available as an ebook for only $12.80. Purchasing
the ebook enables you to download DRM-free files in APK, ePub, Mobi
and PDF formats.
On 01/11/2011 03:00 PM, Oliver Peters wrote:
Hello,
I'm on WinXP and using sqlite 3.7.4 with the CLI. I try to insert ~ 10,100,000
records into a schema with different tables (http://pastebin.com/cbsPHNEj).
The
db file has already 1.9 GB when I start the INSERTs via
sqlite3 -bail
There's the issue of this is what I meant vs. this is what I did. When
you have a couple hundred customer's, changing the code is painful but
doable. When you have a couple million customer's, then what is out
there is the true API and must be kept around. Microsoft has bent over
backwards
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:55 AM, youfei.c...@emc.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
I don't know if I have collected accurate and enough information for you,
please check and let me know.
As you said, I'm calling sqlite apis to add callbacks, without any kind of
changes to sourcecode. The routine I'm
hello:
Now the SQLITE3 database we use is version 3.6.23.1.which running in the red
hat compiler and the hardware system is Linux(version 2.6).We have a problem
that for table and struct is miss at working.
Attachment is exception database.
___
24 matches
Mail list logo
