Hi everyone.
VB.Net 2005, I am trying to add sqlite3.dll to the Project References. When I
try to Add the dll I get an error message:
'A reference to {path to sqlite3.dll} could not be added. Please make sure that
the file is accessible, and that it is a valid assembly or COM component.'
The
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Stephen
Stephen Kervin
Solutions Architect and Development Manager at SunGard
Reading, United Kingdom
Confirm that you know Stephen Kervin
On 3 Mar 2011, at 09:23, J Trahair wrote:
Hi everyone.
VB.Net 2005, I am trying to add sqlite3.dll to the Project References. When I
try to Add the dll I get an error message:
'A reference to {path to sqlite3.dll} could not be added. Please make sure
that the file is accessible, and
On 02/03/2011 17:30, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:53:51AM +0100, alexis bialot scratched on the wall:
hello,
this looks to me like a bug but maybe this is just my misunderstanding.
You might run an integrity check on the database file and verify
any indexes you have
A favorite interview question is, given this line and no other
information, how big must buf_size be to never clip the output?
You can assume the default 1.6 precision (%1.6f).
snprintf( buf, buf_size, %f, v );
The answer? At least 318 characters.
This is very interesting. Jay, could
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:06:33AM -0500, Pavel Ivanov scratched on the wall:
?A favorite interview question is, given this line and no other
?information, how big must buf_size be to never clip the output?
?You can assume the default 1.6 precision (%1.6f).
? ?snprintf( buf, buf_size, %f,
I had an impression that for such big number it will be printed in
scientific notation. But I guess that's the difference between %g and
%f. And it turns out my habit of using %g instead of %f is a very good
thing.
Thank you very much for the explanation, Jay.
Pavel
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:06
Hi there,
When I create a new table by using aggregate functions and the GROUP
by clause, the newly generated columns do not have any data type
affinity according to the schema info, while the old columns to which
I apply the aggregate functions all have data type affinity. I wonder
how SQLite
I'm getting a little closer to pointing the finger
at sqlite. I rebuilt my application using an archived
binary from march 2009, and it works in the cases where
a modern binary fails.
It appears that some change in sqlite locking strategy between
2009 and now is not completely compatible with
chen jia chen_1...@fisher.osu.edu wrote:
When I create a new table by using aggregate functions and the GROUP
by clause, the newly generated columns do not have any data type
affinity according to the schema info, while the old columns to which
I apply the aggregate functions all have data
10 matches
Mail list logo
