Dann Luciano wrote:
sqlite is part of the Google Summer of Code 2013?
No: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2013.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Android does have SQLite builtin, however it is under a rather large amount
of abstractions that does not correlate directly to the SQLite API, making
it difficult to port code between platforms. Another issue is, each
manufacturer / device / firmware version have a different build of SQLite,
some
Android does have SQLite builtin, however it is under a rather large amount
of abstractions that does not correlate directly to the SQLite API, making
it difficult to port code between platforms. Another issue is, each
manufacturer / device / firmware version have a different build of SQLite,
some
Hi.
I received a report that the result of the following SQL has changed
since 3.7.15.
I haven't looked into the sqlite source yet, but can we call this a bug?
Regards,
Kenichi Ishigaki
-
create table cd (id integer primary key, title unique, year);
insert into cd (title, year) values
On 04/13/2013 11:22 PM, kenichi ishigaki wrote:
Hi.
I received a report that the result of the following SQL has changed
since 3.7.15.
I haven't looked into the sqlite source yet, but can we call this a bug?
No. No ORDER BY clause means that the results are delivered in
an undefined order. So
D. Richard Hipp said...
SQLite version 3.7.16.2 is now available on the SQLite website
http://www.sqlite.org/
The 3.7.16.2 patch release contains a two-character change in the Windows
OS interface that fixes a long-standing race condition that could lead to
database corruption. This bug
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:22:46 +0900, kenichi ishigaki wrote:
Hi.
I received a report that the result of the following SQL has changed
since 3.7.15.
I haven't looked into the sqlite source yet, but can we call this a bug?
Regards,
Kenichi Ishigaki
-
create table cd (id integer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/04/13 14:55, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
Can this problem also from a DB file shared via Windows Shared folder
An effective way to corrupt your data is to use a networked filesystem.
They do not provide the exact required semantics as a local
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:41PM +0700, Dan Kennedy scratched on the wall:
On 04/13/2013 11:22 PM, kenichi ishigaki wrote:
Hi.
I received a report that the result of the following SQL has changed
since 3.7.15.
I haven't looked into the sqlite source yet, but can we call this a bug?
No.