? Does sqlite3 use table level locking ?
Regards,
Roushan
--
Gé Weijers
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;);
}
--
Gé Weijers
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sean Heber wrote:
My database file is only around 4MB and I have set the
default_cache_size to 5. From what I've read, that should
translate to almost 50MB of cache size which would be more than
enough to keep the entire database in memory, I'd think. Yet it
doesn't seem to
Vladimir,
When you execute individual statements and sqlite3_step or sqlite3_exec
returns an error code you should execute a 'ROLLBACK' in stead of a
'COMMIT'. So the logic is:
exec BEGIN
perform a bunch of statements
if(all statements successful)
exec COMMIT
else
exec ROLLBACK
Ideally
John Buck wrote:
MySql works like you described.. Frankly im surprised Postgres doesn't .
Id imagine there must be a continue trnasaction command or something.
You can define a 'savepoint' inside a transaction. If something goes
wrong you roll back to the savepoint and continue from there.
Greg Miller wrote:
Thomas Briggs wrote:
From the looks of this warning, I would guess that you could redefine
SQLITE_STATIC like this (or some variation of this that is legal C++)
to solve
the problem:
#define SQLITE_STATIC ((extern C void(*)(void*)) 0)
what about
typedef void
Tomas Franzén wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SQLite to access a database that is created and used by
another application. Sometimes when I try to access it, I get an error
back that the database is locked. This lock seems to be pretty long
lasting, so I don't think I can't wait until it's
Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Hi Gerry,
Gerry Blanchette wrote:
Greetings All,
In general, is passing NULL to sqlite3_bind_text() as parameter 5 valid,
instead of using either SQLITE_STATIC or SQLITE_TRANSIENT? (My bind
value is a heap pointer which I manage).
I ask because on SOLARIS,
Same thing on Mac OSX. Must be a platform-independent issue.
Gé
Richard Boulton wrote:
Hi,
I'm running the latest sqlite 3.2.1 command line tool on Windows XP and have
noticed that I don't seem to be able to store 48bit integers anymore :-S
CREATE TABLE test (a INTEGER);
INSERT INTO test
Maksim,
Some things you could try:
1) increase cache memory
You may be causing a lot of cache misses if the size of the query result
is very large compared to the size of the cache. Index-based searches
can cause multiple reloads of the same page because of a lack of
locality in the cache. An
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
so, just with plain ascii file i get four times the speed i get with
sqlite. note that my c program will scale linearly with the size of
dataset (just like i see with sqlite).
With anything related to computers, there are always tradeoffs - most
commonly power
Jonathan Zdziarski wrote:
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
Are you sure your users are not, in fact, filling up their disk
drives?
nope, plenty of free space on the drives. The 50MB limit seems to be
very exact as well...exactly 51,200,000 bytes. I'm stumped too.
Assuming your application is
12 matches
Mail list logo
