On 16.08.2013 18:03, Gary Weaver wrote:
Thanks to you and Richard for the links and info. Concurrency is not outlandish
to expect, especially when it works in OS X and just not in the Ubuntu vm in
Travis, but I now understand that these are expected problems.
Yuriy,
Thanks for following up. Henrik of TravisCI had said that We do not use
network filesystems by default. We do use ramfs for some databases, but I
don't think SQLite would use ramfs by default unless you put the database
in an odd location. I'm also fairly sure we don't disable locks in any
On 16.08.2013 18:03, Gary Weaver wrote:
Thanks to you and Richard for the links and info. Concurrency is not
outlandish to expect, especially when it works in OS X and just not in
the Ubuntu vm in Travis, but I now understand that these are expected
problems.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
On 16.08.2013 18:03, Gary Weaver wrote:
You're right concurrency is not outlandish but from the viewpoint of
sqlite it was therefore this answer and the link.
Hold on here.
What do you mean it works in OS X and
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Gary Weaver garyswea...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anything that stands out as something that would keep 30
processes from being able to concurrently insert into the same tables?
Yes.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Gary Weaver garyswea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going to stop on this for now, because it sounds like SQLite was never
intended to support concurrent writes to a file DB from what you said, so
there is no use trying to debug an use case that isn't supported. I am
On 15.08.2013 21:39, Gary Weaver wrote:
SQLite varies between file is encrypted/not a DB errors and database disk image
is malformed. It would seem consistent with SQLite not handling concurrent
processing in this particular environment or with the version of SQLite since
3.7.7 is fine in OS
On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:47 PM, ibrahim ibrahim.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 15.08.2013 21:39, Gary Weaver wrote:
SQLite varies between file is encrypted/not a DB errors and database disk
image is malformed. It would seem consistent with SQLite not handling
concurrent processing in this
On 16 Aug 2013, at 5:03pm, Gary Weaver garyswea...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to you and Richard for the links and info. Concurrency is not
outlandish to expect, especially when it works in OS X and just not in the
Ubuntu vm in Travis, but I now understand that these are expected problems.
Gary Weaver wrote:
On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:47 PM, ibrahim ibrahim.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 15.08.2013 21:39, Gary Weaver wrote:
SQLite varies between file is encrypted/not a DB errors and database disk
image is malformed. It would seem consistent with SQLite not handling
concurrent
SQLite DB (file) corruption in travisci vm with 3.7.9 (latest they had
available). Link to logs showing errors, code to reproduce here:
https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/1334
Is there something in config, etc. that would help?
___
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Gary Weaver garyswea...@gmail.com wrote:
SQLite DB (file) corruption in travisci vm with 3.7.9 (latest they had
available). Link to logs showing errors, code to reproduce here:
https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/1334
Is there something in config,
On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Gary Weaver garyswea...@gmail.com wrote:
SQLite DB (file) corruption in travisci vm with 3.7.9 (latest they had
available). Link to logs showing errors, code to reproduce here:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Gary Weaver garyswea...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything that stands out as something that would keep 30
processes from being able to concurrently insert into the same tables?
Yes. SQLite does not (and has never) supported that. Multiple processes
can
14 matches
Mail list logo
