In my code, I delete the view before attempting to recreate it by
executing the prepared statement. Isn't that the time to validate
whether there are semantic problems with the statement?
Yes, validation happens only at the time of execution. So you are
apparently doing something wrong and
Quoth Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org, on 2010-08-26 13:38:36 +0100:
I'm sorry to ask this, but can you check for us whether a VIEW by
that name really does exist ? Don't forget, VIEWs get saved in the
file, they're not part of the attachment.
And to add to that: if you want them to merely
On 26/08/10 12:20, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
Yes, validation happens only at the time of execution. So you are
apparently doing something wrong and you better show your code.
easiest is to provide links to a copy. I've added a .txt extension to
all the files to stop them being executed by the web
On 26/08/10 13:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
On 26 Aug 2010, at 12:12pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
This time it reported that the view it would have created failed because
the table (view) already existed.
I'm sorry to ask this, but can you check for us whether a VIEW by that name
really does exist
On 26 Aug 2010, at 3:36pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/08/10 13:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
On 26 Aug 2010, at 12:12pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
This time it reported that the view it would have created failed because
the table (view) already existed.
I'm sorry to ask this, but can you check
I'm sorry to ask this, but can you check for us whether a VIEW by that name
really does exist ? Don't forget, VIEWs get saved in the file, they're not
part of the attachment.
Yes it does
So you are trying to create a VIEW which does already exist. In that case,
there's no mystery
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 04:32:11PM +0100, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
On 26 Aug 2010, at 3:36pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/08/10 13:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
On 26 Aug 2010, at 12:12pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
This time it reported that the view it would have created failed
Jay A. Kreibich j...@kreibi.ch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 04:32:11PM +0100, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
On 26 Aug 2010, at 3:36pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/08/10 13:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
On 26 Aug 2010, at 12:12pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
This time it reported that the
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:59:03AM -0400, Igor Tandetnik scratched on the wall:
Jay A. Kreibich j...@kreibi.ch wrote:
So you are trying to create a VIEW which does already exist. In that
case, there's no mystery about why you're getting an error message.
No, he's trying the *PREPARE*
On 26 Aug 2010, at 4:59pm, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
Jay A. Kreibich j...@kreibi.ch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 04:32:11PM +0100, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
On 26 Aug 2010, at 3:36pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/08/10 13:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
So you are trying to create a
On 26/08/10 17:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
So someone can check it out. Try it with a VIEW that definitely doesn't
exist, or use
CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS ...
As far as I can work it out, the statement then prepares OK - but seems
then to execute as a no op. Since having completed that
On 26/08/10 20:29, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/08/10 17:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
So someone can check it out. Try it with a VIEW that definitely doesn't
exist, or use
CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS ...
As far as I can work it out, the statement then prepares OK - but seems
then to execute as
On 26 Aug 2010, at 8:29pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/08/10 17:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
So someone can check it out. Try it with a VIEW that definitely doesn't
exist, or use
CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS ...
As far as I can work it out, the statement then prepares OK - but seems
then
13 matches
Mail list logo
