At 22:03 13/12/2006, you wrote:
I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time
and CPU understanding SQL...
Check HFS(16/32 bits) and HFS+(64 bits) filesystems from Apple, they
use B+ trees. The code is open source and you can find it on Darwin repository.
I mean.. is there a manual that explain how to use SQLite Core in low level
API, like berkeley DB, without SQL.
Thank to all
On 13/12/06, Cesar Rodas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all
I starting a project http://code.google.com/p/gxdfs/ that is a Distributed
File System, following the
:21 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite] Re: File Syste
I mean.. is there a manual that explain how to use SQLite Core in low
level
API, like berkeley DB, without SQL.
Thank to all
On 13/12/06, Cesar Rodas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all
I starting a project http
the
public API will get you pretty far.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Rodas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:21 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite] Re: File Syste
I mean.. is there a manual that explain how to use SQLite Core in low
level
API, like
The Sqlite API is fully documented and the source code is clearly
written and commented and reads quite simply as a definition of its
philosophy and function.
Cesar Rodas wrote:
I mean.. is there a manual that explain how to use SQLite Core in low level
API, like berkeley DB, without SQL.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:02:37 -0400, you wrote:
I mean the SQLite Core API, something like Berkeley DB.
I'd like to use SQLite B+tree API.
It has quite recently been discussed, you may want to try to
search the mailing list archives.
The conclusion was: the B+tree API is usable but it is easy
It is hard to imagine why you would want to use Sqlite B-Tree access.
Kees Nuyt wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:02:37 -0400, you wrote:
I mean the SQLite Core API, something like Berkeley DB.
I'd like to use SQLite B+tree API.
It has quite recently been discussed, you may want to try to
I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time
and CPU understanding SQL...
On 13/12/06, John Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is hard to imagine why you would want to use Sqlite B-Tree access.
Kees Nuyt wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:02:37 -0400, you wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:03:50PM -0400, Cesar Rodas wrote:
On 13/12/06, John Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is hard to imagine why you would want to use Sqlite B-Tree access.
I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time
and CPU understanding SQL...
If you are using a B-Tree index for a file system why incorporate
Sqlite, why not just write the file system code? B-Trees are well
documented.
Cesar Rodas wrote:
I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost
time
and CPU understanding SQL...
On 13/12/06, John
10 matches
Mail list logo
