Thanks for your help.
On 6/16/10 8:11 AM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this working as designed and the 3.0.8 behavior was incorrect? Or is this
a valid bug?
I'm not developer of SQLite and don't know what did they intend to do.
But applying common sense I'd say that behavior
I scanned through the bug list on the website and didn't see one that was
related to this, so please forgive me if this has already been answered.
We have created a function that takes a string and returns a substring that is
split on a given character (I'll provide the source below), called
Is this working as designed and the 3.0.8 behavior was incorrect? Or is this
a valid bug?
I'm not developer of SQLite and don't know what did they intend to do.
But applying common sense I'd say that behavior of 3.0.8 was incorrect
and it's fixed in 3.6.23. To get the same result as you used
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:46:17PM -0700, Jeff Webb scratched on the wall:
Is this working as designed and the 3.0.8 behavior was incorrect?
It sounds like it. Collations are typically not promoted through
operations. Having one promoted from a function parameter to the
result seems