Works like a charm! Thank you!
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Miroslav Stampar <
miroslav.stam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Artjom.
>
> Could you please retry it now with the latest r5106?
>
> Kind regards,
> Miroslav Stampar
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Artjom wrote:
>
>> Thank you!
>>
Hi Artjom.
Could you please retry it now with the latest r5106?
Kind regards,
Miroslav Stampar
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Artjom wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Miroslav Stampar <
> miroslav.stam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Artjom.
>>
>> You are right. It's an iss
Thank you!
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Miroslav Stampar wrote:
> Hi Artjom.
>
> You are right. It's an issue where the authentication was made only for
> the single url cases. Will fix this ASAP and report and you back.
>
> Kind regards,
> Miroslav Stampar
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:37 AM
Hi Artjom.
You are right. It's an issue where the authentication was made only for the
single url cases. Will fix this ASAP and report and you back.
Kind regards,
Miroslav Stampar
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Miroslav Stampar <
miroslav.stam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It's probably a bu
Hi.
It's probably a bug. Will check it and report back.
Kind regards,
Miroslav Stampar
On May 29, 2012 9:21 PM, "Artjom" wrote:
> Not sure if it's an issue or I am doing something wrong. The site requires
> basic auth. If I use "-u" and specify just one url, everything works.
> However if I use
Not sure if it's an issue or I am doing something wrong. The site requires
basic auth. If I use "-u" and specify just one url, everything works.
However if I use "-m" auth fails.
Did I miss something in man?
Artjom
--
Liv
