On 3/21/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't said SQLObject is a dead end. I think the codebase needsrethinking, as well as thinking about what its scope should really be.I'll just refer you to my clp discussion with Steve vis a vis the semantics of "dead end." :)
And "fragmenting
On 3/18/06, Daniel Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Franzoni wrote:> Now, my 2c: do we really need *two* ORMs in the Python community?I agree with this sentiment as well. If voting would change anything, I'd vote to have SQLObject2 built as a layer on top of SQLAlchemy. If this is not possibl
On 3/18/06, Alan Franzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, my 2c: do we really need *two* ORMs in the Python community?I agree that we do not.But really this sentiment should be directed towards Ian Bicking; he's finally (implicitly) admitted that SqlObject is a dead end, but instead of throwing his
