Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-22 Thread Nick Murdoch
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:47:54 +0100, Robert Forkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Nick Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> The difference to me is that SQLAlchemy requires you to know how SQL >> works >> in much greater depth, /and/ to learn how SQLAlch

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-22 Thread Robert Forkel
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Nick Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The difference to me is that SQLAlchemy requires you to know how SQL works > in much greater depth, /and/ to learn how SQLAlchemy interfaces with it > all, before you can start using it. I'm not a DB expert, and I like

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-22 Thread Nick Murdoch
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:21:26 +0100, Daniel Fetchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But have you given any thought as to positioning against SQLAlechemy? >> >> It's a totally appropriate answer to say that you'll just continue >> working >> on SQLObject and not really pay attention to what oth

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-21 Thread Oleg Broytmann
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:18:42PM -0300, Sam's Lists wrote: > But have you given any thought as to positioning against SQLAlechemy? I haven't. There is a number of ORMs in the Python world (SO, SA, Storm, PyDO, Database Row, Yet Another ORM, etc.) but I don't have any idea of their advantages

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-21 Thread Daniel Fetchinson
> But have you given any thought as to positioning against SQLAlechemy? > > It's a totally appropriate answer to say that you'll just continue working > on SQLObject and not really pay attention to what others are doing, of > course. > > But I think that if we want to continue to get new users, we

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-21 Thread Sam's Lists
Oleg.. (and other developers) I hope you don't mind the question But have you given any thought as to positioning against SQLAlechemy? It's a totally appropriate answer to say that you'll just continue working on SQLObject and not really pay attention to what others are doing, of course. Bu

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-21 Thread Oleg Broytmann
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:15:54AM -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote: > maybe the work is too much > for a single person. It is, to an extent. But anyone can help. Code, tests, documentation - any help will be great help! > Sometimes you hear people saying that sqlobject's > development is slow

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-21 Thread Daniel Fetchinson
> Hello! The first thing I want to tell is that SQLObject is a community > project. There are people who provide patches (sometime big patches for > major features), there are developers who have commit access to the > Subversion repository. I am one of those, but certainly far from being the > onl

Re: [SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-20 Thread Oleg Broytmann
Hello! The first thing I want to tell is that SQLObject is a community project. There are people who provide patches (sometime big patches for major features), there are developers who have commit access to the Subversion repository. I am one of those, but certainly far from being the only one. On

[SQLObject] the future of sqlobject

2008-04-20 Thread Daniel Fetchinson
Oleg, I was searching for a document outlining the future of sqlobject but couldn't find any so here it goes: In the current development phase are you primarily concentrating on bug fixes and maintenance releases? Do you have plans for developing totally new features? Would you be willing to devel