Oké so if I understand correctly, the x86_64 has newer binaries like
MySQL. The i*86 does not.
DBD::SQLite only. I'm currently trying to build for i*86/Perl 5.24.
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slimdevices.com
mherger wrote:
> > and software from Qnap. And in 1.09e x86_64 have a real x86_64 perl
> > version. The 1.10 up until uses a i*86 perl.
>
> LMS comes with new binaries for x86_64, but not i*86.
>
> --
>
> MichaelOké so if I understand correctly, the x86_64 has newer binaries like
MySQL. The
and software from Qnap. And in 1.09e x86_64 have a real x86_64 perl
version. The 1.10 up until uses a i*86 perl.
LMS comes with new binaries for x86_64, but not i*86.
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slimdevices.com
Can't be that difficult to get it working, but...
*SqueezeBoxes:* 2x SB2 (Living room and study), 1x Radio (Kitchen), 1x
Boom (Dining room), 1x piCorePlayer (jacuzzi), 1x piCorePlayer (Garden)
1x OSMC + Squeezelite (Movie room), 1x Touch (Bedroom)
*Server:* LMS on Pi3 7.9.1. on PcP 3.21
digimaster wrote:
> QLMS version 1.09.e uses the same perl version. So there is not the
> difference. The only thing which is different. It that uses libraries
> and software from Qnap. And in 1.09e x86_64 have a real x86_64 perl
> version. The 1.10 up until uses a i*86 perl.
>
> Send from
dolodobendan wrote:
> Ok, now we know why my LMS is slower with the latest version. Thank you!
>
> Going back to the older, newer version for now.
>
> @digimaster: If you could arrange for new builds to have a name like
> QLMS2 so that I can keep my working QLMS besides new builds for
Oh, LMS doesn't have binaries for that platform yet.
Could you tell me more.
I haven't updated all the binaries, but only those requested. Perl
5.24/i386 wasn't on that list so far.
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
mherger wrote:
> >Perl Version: 5.24.4 - i686-linux-thread-multi-64int
> >Database Version: DBD::SQLite 1.34_01 (sqlite 3.7.7.1)
> >
> > Does it come with its own dbd thus overwriting possible updates in
> LMS'
> > build?
>
> Oh, LMS doesn't have binaries for that platform yet.
>
>
Perl Version: 5.24.4 - i686-linux-thread-multi-64int
Database Version: DBD::SQLite 1.34_01 (sqlite 3.7.7.1)
Does it come with its own dbd thus overwriting possible updates in LMS'
build?
Oh, LMS doesn't have binaries for that platform yet.
--
Michael
digimaster wrote:
> The latest QLMS New installation out of the box installs the latest
> officieel release 7.9.1. But one can edit the QLMS.conf file to get the
> latest nightly betas. So if one wants the nightly, beta release they
> have to edit the line #NIGHTLY=0 to NIGHTLY=1. And restart
dolodobendan wrote:
> Removing .IONICE didn't speed up things on my end. Is it possible that
> 1.10.x still uses the older db for some reason?As I wrote a time ago, out of
> the box nightly is disable, due to the
issue with flac and glibc version errors on older Qnap running QTS 4.2
or lower.
dolodobendan wrote:
> Removing .IONICE didn't speed up things on my end. Is it possible that
> 1.10.x still uses the older db for some reason?Did you active nightly in the
> config file?
Send from my mobile Phone
*
maintainer of QLogitechMediaServer, QOptware-NG and QAutoSub.
Qnap
dolodobendan wrote:
> Thank you for confirming my suspicion that the latest QLMS is using the
> old db driver.
>
> @digimaster: Is this intentional?The latest QLMS New installation out of the
> box installs the latest
officieel release 7.9.1. But one can edit the QLMS.conf file to get the
mherger wrote:
> > Code:
> >
> > Database Version: DBD::SQLite 1.34_01 (sqlite 3.7.7.1)
> >
> > Is this the new one?
>
> No, that's old. New is DBD::SQLite 1.58 (sqlite 3.22.0).
>
> --
>
> Michael
Thank you for confirming my suspicion that
Code:
Database Version: DBD::SQLite 1.34_01 (sqlite 3.7.7.1)
Is this the new one?
No, that's old. New is DBD::SQLite 1.58 (sqlite 3.22.0).
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
digimaster wrote:
> A thing what you could try, is go to the QLMS directory, and remove the
> file .IONICE. Then restart QLMS, and try if it's faster for you. As I
> wrote at my end, lms is much faster then before.
>
> Send from my mobile Phone
I'll give it a try and get back to you, thanks!
mherger wrote:
> > Yes, the database upgrade reduced scanning time down to 2:45h, that's
> > why I'm a bit puzzled here. Also, while the overall scanning time was
> > reduced, building the fulltext index was up to 45min (it was around
> 3min
> > before). With 1.10.x I see overall scanning time
dolodobendan wrote:
> Yes, the database upgrade reduced scanning time down to 2:45h, that's
> why I'm a bit puzzled here. Also, while the overall scanning time was
> reduced, building the fulltext index was up to 45min (it was around 3min
> before). With 1.10.x I see overall scanning time way
18 matches
Mail list logo
