It may need a full rescan rather than just a new and changed media files
scan.
Apesbrain wrote:
> And, yes, once this change is made LMS will separate the tracks
> appropriately on the next library rescan.
Shozzer's Prof
Applying some kind of disambiguation to the album title seems to be the
most obvious choice.
SpiderJon wrote:
> Slightly less inelegant would be just "Evanescence" and "Evanescence
> (EP)" — ie, if it doesn't say it's something else, it's an album.
OK, I'll go with that convention, it soun
And, yes, once this change is made LMS will separate the tracks
appropriately on the next library rescan.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices
SpiderJon wrote:
> Slightly less inelegant would be just "Evanescence" and "Evanescence
> (EP)" ie, if it doesn't say it's something else, it's an album.
I think that's MUCH less inelegant! Maybe even approaching a state of
elegance.
LMS 8 nightly running on Raspberry Pi OS. Mostly virt
RobbH wrote:
> It's not elegant, but I would deal with this by changing the album title
> tags to, respectively "Evanescence (EP)" and "Evanescence (LP)".
> Wouldn't LMS then distinguish between them?
Slightly less inelegant would be just "Evanescence" and "Evanescence
(EP)" ie, if it does
It's not elegant, but I would deal with this by changing the album title
tags to, respectively "Evanescence (EP)" and "Evanescence (LP)".
Wouldn't LMS then distinguish between them?
LMS 8 nightly running on Raspberry Pi OS. Mostly virtual players,
occasionally with SB Radio, Boom or Classic.
-
Hi all,
today I found out I am experiencing a problem with a rather unusual
constellation:
In my LMS media library I have an artist with two "albums" of the same
title.
How come? Actually only one is a real album while the other one is just
an EP.
(FYI: The band is Evanescence who released a sel
