mherger wrote:
> > It's when transcoding to wav/pcm they don't work
>
> Oh, that might be the reason why I missed most of this thread. "Doctor,
>
> doctor! When I slap my head, it hurts!" - "Then don't slap your head.".
>
> --
>
> Michael
Yeah I totally get that :) but the same transcoding
It's when transcoding to wav/pcm they don't work
Oh, that might be the reason why I missed most of this thread. "Doctor,
doctor! When I slap my head, it hurts!" - "Then don't slap your head.".
--
Michael
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter
It's a bit more complicated natively they played fine .
It's when transcoding to wav/pcm they don't work , until you reecode
them to flac again.
So OP has 2 working solutions already .
Play them natively .
Reflac the offending files , which where not to many, most of his files
works just fine.
Files are not entirerly OK but at what level should LMS scan reject them
I didn't follow all of the discussion... but hasn't there in the past
been an issue if flac files were compressed at a high level? Could this
be the case here?
--
Michael
___
On the topic wonder if michael want sthese files .
They work on other aplications .
They dont work on LMS .
They work if you recode them to new flac files .
Files are not entirerly OK but at what level should LMS scan reject them
?
---
mherger wrote:
> (to make this even more OT: install cygwin and openssh. First thing I do
>
> on a Windows system I have to use :-))
>
Sorry, keeping it OT.
Some alternatives (only used WSL up to now):
- Microsoft is now providing an OpenSSH implementation:
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/pow
(still OT.. I'm a Unix admin forced to use a Windows client, putty is
painful when sessions drop and the window vanishes, configuring it is
painful, putty's scp is functional but very very slow, I'm just
surprised that it doesn't get more development effort given how
widespread its use seems to be
(still OT.. I'm a Unix admin forced to use a Windows client, putty is
painful when sessions drop and the window vanishes, configuring it is
painful, putty's scp is functional but very very slow, I'm just
surprised that it doesn't get more development effort given how
widespread its use seems to be
drmatt wrote:
> Yep, sorry, OT. Find myself having to use putty all the time, but all I
> do is work around it.
Not sure what you mean use Putty and then work around it. It is a remote
ssh connection and so functionality is that of Windows command prompt
but is accessible from all OS's that suppo
Yep, sorry, OT. Find myself having to use putty all the time, but all I
do is work around it.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44
drmatt wrote:
> Fair enough. Putty is ubiquitous, functional, and yet utterly appalling.
> Why the hell has the windows world not moved on from putty?
This is OT - the OP got command line OK and has tested the file. Problem
is restricted to specific files.
wrt Putty - Unlike X - Windows windowin
Fair enough. Putty is ubiquitous, functional, and yet utterly appalling.
Why the hell has the windows world not moved on from putty?
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB
drmatt wrote:
> Between minuses converted to "long dash", quotes lost in translation and
> line breaks becoming, well, line breaks, there are a large number of
> ways this command might not make it intact to where you want it to be
> run.
>
> However I'd also question winscp's terminal behaviour
eduardoo wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. I took extra care inputting the command and was
> able to have it executed on the problem track as well as on a normal
> track.
>
> Here is the output of the problem track:
>
> /share/CACHEDEV1_DATA/.qpkg/LogitechMediaServer$
> "SlimServer/Bin/i386-linu
Thanks for the advice. I took extra care inputting the command and was
able to have it executed on the problem track as well as on a normal
track.
Here is the output of the problem track:
/share/CACHEDEV1_DATA/.qpkg/LogitechMediaServer$
"SlimServer/Bin/i386-linux/flac" -dc --force-raw-format --
eduardoo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I also did a little testing by converting those flac files to flac again
> using Foobar. While Foobar reported corrupt files after converting,
> those new files actually play fine on LMS even when transcoded.
> Interesting.
>
> Thanks.
..So there could be someth
Between minuses converted to "long dash", quotes lost in translation and
line breaks becoming, well, line breaks, there are a large number of
ways this command might not make it intact to where you want it to be
run.
However I'd also question winscp's terminal behaviour, I've never
actually used
eduardoo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I tried inputting that command on a terminal started with Winscp. As
> soon as I entered, a swirling circle came up for a while and then it
> says it lost connection. Probably more about me doing something wrong
> with the test than the actual outcome of the test?
As
bpa wrote:
> I don't know what's wrong. My guess is the transcoding command line is
> failiing for some reason. To test this theory, run the following
> command from a shell prompt and see if it produces an error message. If
> it runs OK it will generate a RAW file called test.raw
> >
Code:
--
Mnyb wrote:
> Thats interesting , but I've heard worse about medieval about effing
> about with gapless etc .
And I've seen worse. I never really bothered how and under which
circumstances it messes up the files, but it does.
QLMS 7.9.1@1.07.4 (digimaster) / QNAP 469L QTS 4.3.4
--
eduardoo wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not good at all with this Linux stuff. So, can you please be
> more specific as to what is wrong and what exactly I am supposed to do?
>
> Thanks.
I don't know what's wrong. My guess is the transcoding command line is
failiing for some reason. To test this theory
bpa wrote:
> From the log.
> The error in red usually means the command line at
> "tokenizeConvertCommand2 (617) Using command for conversion" in blue
> failed for some reason so check the command below (i.e. no c or s
> option) at a shell prompt and see what error message Flac throw up.
> "/shar
eduardoo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the log during failed playback of the files which are otherwise
> playable when playing flac direct and not transcoded.
>
> I also did a little testing by converting those flac files to flac again
> using Foobar. While Foobar reported corrupt files after c
Hi all,
Here is the log during failed playback of the files which are otherwise
playable when playing flac direct and not transcoded.
Thanks.
+---+
|Filename: log.txt |
|Download: h
Paul Webster wrote:
> Some suggestions over at
> http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=174184
> Regarding "corrupt" files ... according to that thread some of the tools
> and a self-promoting tag to the newly generated file - so not really
> corrupting and you could remove the tag with other t
Mnyb wrote:
> Btw is there any tools invoved making per track flac files from one big
> album flac file with cue sheet ?
>
> I have learned that one should use cue-tools flacon or anything but
> medieval cue splitter that tool. n corrupt the files ?
Foobar2000 will do this.
Mnyb wrote:
> Btw is there any tools invoved making per track flac files from one big
> album flac file with cue sheet ?
>
> I have learned that one should use cue-tools flacon or anything but
> medieval cue splitter that tool. n corrupt the files ?
Some suggestions over at
http://forum.doom9
I had to write some scripts to load id3 tag data and rewrite it back as
vorbis tags. One or two older taggers defaulted to id3, I don't use
those now.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1
Btw is there any tools invoved making per track flac files from one big
album flac file with cue sheet ?
I have learned that one should use cue-tools flacon or anything but
medieval cue splitter that tool. n corrupt the files ?
drmatt wrote:
> I wonder if your transcode is resampling? That would be the one and only
> reason it might sound different.
>
>
> -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
Exact resampling can be setup in varius ways trough SoX diffrent
filterslopes and actually some margins added can change
I wonder if your transcode is resampling? That would be the one and only
reason it might sound different.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less t
drmatt wrote:
> Usually this comes down to those particular files containing a different
> type of tag, or are set to a different bit depth or sample rate from the
> others. I'm not going to comment on the audibility other than to say
> there shouldn't be any reason at all, but I've been using sp
bpa wrote:
> Enable logging player.source to DEBUG to see why transcoding is failing
> (i.e it will show which rules failed).
>
> Enable logging player.source, note time at start of test, do test, note
> time at end of test. Copy ALL log entries between start and end time to
> a text file, zip a
eduardoo wrote:
> Yes, set to playing flac natively, those files play fine. As for the
> audibility issue, transcoding to wav does seem to sound slightly better
> (although there's no strong reason why. Perhaps playing flac strains the
> renderer more than playing wav?), and apparently I'm not t
eduardoo wrote:
> I can't see why these particular files can't be transcoded.
Enable logging player.source to DEBUG to see why transcoding is failing
(i.e it will show which rules failed).
Enable logging player.source, note time at start of test, do test, note
time at end of test. Copy ALL log
bpa wrote:
> IIRC This possibility was tested on Touch. CPU load is higher when
> playing WAV than Flac possibly because of higher network traffic, more
> packets, less space for buffering etc.
WAV is less compressed than FLAC (about 2 to 3 times larger typically),
so WAV will use more network
eduardoo wrote:
> Perhaps playing flac strains the renderer more than playing wav?
IIRC This possibility was tested on Touch. CPU load is higher when
playing WAV than Flac possibly because of higher network traffic, more
packets, less space for buffering etc.
--
drmatt wrote:
> And you've stopped transcoding to wav to see if it's the software decode
> step that's failing .. ? .. (which should be inaudible unless you are
> utterly mangling the sample rate or bit depth during this transcode
> step).
>
>
> -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
Yes,
And you've stopped transcoding to wav to see if it's the software decode
step that's failing .. ? .. (which should be inaudible unless you are
utterly mangling the sample rate or bit depth during this transcode
step).
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio,
philippe_44 wrote:
> Even when activating transcoding/player streaming logs?
What's this? How do I go about finding it?
Thanks.
eduardoo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25850
View this thread:
eduardoo wrote:
> Hi, Phillipe.
>
> I didn't post a server log because there was no error listed in it. As
> for the UPnP bridge, I just used it briefly for troubleshooting to see
> if it is the renderer's problem or the server's problem. I usually just
> use LMS to play to an SOTM SMS-100 wh
philippe_44 wrote:
> You should post a server log. When you mention LMS DLNA plugin, do you
> mean UPnP bridge? If you do, can you post a bridge log as well?
Hi, Phillipe.
I didn't post a server log because there was no error listed in it. As
for the UPnP bridge, I just used it briefly for tr
eduardoo wrote:
> Out of my over 10k albums indexed on LMS, there are a few that won't
> play on LMS. When I try to play them, it would display an error message
> saying "Can't open file for...". The files themselves seem pretty
> normal. They're 16/44 files, with metadata displayed perfectly
Out of my over 10k albums indexed on LMS, there are a few that won't
play on LMS. When I try to play them, it would display an error message
saying "Can't open file for...". The files themselves seem pretty
normal. They're 16/44 files, with metadata displayed perfectly on LMS,
and play fine dir
44 matches
Mail list logo