Re: [squid-dev] More woes with ubuntu-precise

On 15/08/2015 3:05 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 08/13/2015 10:52 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> On 14/08/2015 10:18 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: >>> On 08/13/2015 09:29 AM, Kinkie wrote: >>> EnumIterator has brought out one more issue with ubuntu-precise: since it carries gcc-4.6, it doe

Re: [squid-dev] bug 4303

Amos, Christos, Christos' patch seems not to work for plain 3.5.7 sources. What do you suggest to try ? Will there be a snapshot release that is suitable for testing ? Marcus On 08/12/2015 11:32 AM, Marcus Kool wrote: Amos, I tried the patch but several hunks failed. It seems that the patc

[squid-dev] Fedora-20 EOL

Hi, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life , Fedora 20 is EOL since 2015-06-23. Unless anyone has objections, I'd drop it from the build farm and replace it for our purposes with fedora-22, possible also rawhide (aka unstable). Any thoughts? -- Francesco ___

Re: [squid-dev] Fedora-20 EOL

Hey, I do not like rawhide. My basic assumption was that the newest version -1 would be suitable enough for production use. But the update cycle seems too much for most production systems. Eliezer On 18/08/2015 16:20, Kinkie wrote: Hi, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_l

Re: [squid-dev] bug 4303

On 19/08/2015 12:56 a.m., Marcus Kool wrote: > Amos, Christos, > > Christos' patch seems not to work for plain 3.5.7 sources. > What do you suggest to try ? Will there be a snapshot release that is > suitable for testing ? Christos now has it in trunk, but the last snapshot refused to build due

Re: [squid-dev] Fedora-20 EOL

On 19/08/2015 1:20 a.m., Kinkie wrote: > Hi, > according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life , Fedora 20 is > EOL since 2015-06-23. > Unless anyone has objections, I'd drop it from the build farm and replace > it for our purposes with fedora-22, possible also rawhide (aka unstable). > A

Re: [squid-dev] Fedora-20 EOL

On 19/08/2015 3:31 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Hey, > > I do not like rawhide. > My basic assumption was that the newest version -1 would be suitable > enough for production use. > > But the update cycle seems too much for most production systems. Our farm testing use is not just for product

Re: [squid-dev] More woes with ubuntu-precise

On 14/08/2015 3:29 a.m., Kinkie wrote: > Hi, >EnumIterator has brought out one more issue with ubuntu-precise: since > it carries gcc-4.6, it doesn't support std::underlying_type. > > The options are: > - drop support for precise in trunk. I've done this anyway to get trunk and snapshots buil

[squid-dev] [PATCH] FtpServer.cc:1024: "reply != NULL" assertion

Handle nil HttpReply pointer inside various handlers called from Ftp::Server::handleReply(). For example, when the related StoreEntry object is aborted, the client_side_reply.cc code may call the Ftp::Server::handleReply() method with a nil reply pointer. The Ftp::Server::handleReply() metho

[squid-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: trunk-polygraph #819

See -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on polygraph (12.04 amd64-Ubuntu Ubuntu amd64-Ubuntu-12.04 Ubuntu-12.04 amd64) in workspace $ b

Re: [squid-dev] Fedora-20 EOL

In fact, this all started when I was told that the kernel currently shipping in rawhide has a problem where netinet/in.h and linux/in.h are incompatible, and this breaks our build when netfilter is enabled, because both get indirectly inlcluded. IMO rawhide could be : a second-class, nice-to-have c

Re: [squid-dev] bug 4303

On 08/18/2015 12:36 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 19/08/2015 12:56 a.m., Marcus Kool wrote: Amos, Christos, Christos' patch seems not to work for plain 3.5.7 sources. What do you suggest to try ? Will there be a snapshot release that is suitable for testing ? Christos now has it in trunk, b

Re: [squid-dev] More woes with ubuntu-precise

On 08/18/2015 02:11 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > The admin "need" that keeps being put forward is stability. With the > meaning of "non-changing.". As in; nobody touches the Squid code from > now until 2020 or so. Personally, I have not heard anything like that from any admin. The requirements I ha

[squid-dev] [PATCH] Mark aborted RESPMOD bodies as truncated

Hello, When an adaptation service aborts a transaction (for whatever reason), the attached patch marks the body produced by that service as truncated. Without these changes, the recipient of the truncated body (e.g., HTTP client) often cannot tell that the body was actually truncated. This ma

Re: [squid-dev] [PATCH] PayloadFormatter (was PackableStream)

On 08/15/2015 12:20 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I dont like payload particularly either in this case. But page is wrong. > > Page is what the remote end display tool will be generating. *IF* a > "page" exists at all. There are many kinds of payloads. There are many kinds of pages. There are many k

Re: [squid-dev] [PATCH] FtpServer.cc:1024: "reply != NULL" assertion

On 19/08/2015 4:08 a.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote: > > Handle nil HttpReply pointer inside various handlers called from > Ftp::Server::handleReply(). For example, when the related StoreEntry > object is aborted, the client_side_reply.cc code may call the > Ftp::Server::handleReply() method with a