On 10/19/2016 04:59 AM, oleg gv wrote:
> so, it looks like architecture bug that we can't fix, sorry.
No problem. Fixing this bug is far from trivial so your decision to
leave the bug in place for others to fix is certainly understandable.
> but in our case we will try to sync all values to 1024
I am attaching new patch.
On 10/19/2016 07:13 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 10/19/2016 08:49 AM, Christos Tsantilas wrote:
I am attaching a new patch.
I would like to discuss two issues:
* Logging of scheme-less URLs
This is defines a new proto the PROTO_TCP, and for this prints the url
i
The original server_name code mishandled all SNI checks and some rare
host checks:
* The SNI-derived value was pointing to an already freed memory storage.
* Missing host-derived values were not detected (host() is never nil).
* Mismatches were re-checked with an undocumented "none" value inst