Re: [squid-dev] [PATCH] auth_schemes directive

2016-11-27 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 11/19/2016 02:15 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 19/11/2016 12:56 p.m., Eduard Bagdasaryan wrote: >> This patch introduces a new 'auth_schemes' squid.conf directive. >> >> This directive may be used to customize authentication >> schemes presence and order in Squid's HTTP 401 (Unauthorized) and

Re: [squid-dev] [RFC] simplifying ssl_bump complexity

2016-11-27 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 11/19/2016 07:06 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 20/11/2016 12:08 p.m., Marcus Kool wrote: >> The current ssl bump steps allow problematic configs where Squid >> bumps or stares in one step and to splice in an other step, >> which can be resolved (made impossible) in a new configuration syntax.

Re: [squid-dev] [RFC] simplifying ssl_bump complexity

2016-11-27 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 11/19/2016 03:07 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I propose going back to the older config style where each step has its > own directive name which self-documents what it does. IIRC, SslBump has never used step-specific directives: First implementations applied all ssl_bump actions during step1 and

[squid-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: 5-matrix ยป gcc,d-debian-unstable #23

2016-11-27 Thread noc
http://build.squid-cache.org/job/5-matrix/compiler=gcc,label=d-debian-unstable/23/-- [...truncated 34484 lines...] ../../../../src/ssl/support.cc:473:96: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(CRYPTO_EX_DATA*, CRYPTO_EX_DATA*, void*, int, long int, void*)

Re: [squid-dev] [PATCH] Fix for bug 3290

2016-11-27 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17/11/2016 3:43 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote: > Dear developers, > > Please review the attached patch for Squid-5 fixing the issue explained > in the bug report 3290 [1]. The issue is still reproducible using rev. > 14947. > > The problem exists because Squid resets expiration time for a user