Hello,
The attached patch removes broken and, AFAICT, unused "partial copy"
ServerOptions copy constructor.
I am not intimate with the affected code, so more work may be needed
around this change: If the partial copy constructor was meant to be
abused for something, then a new approach should
On 7/04/2016 6:10 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch removes broken and, AFAICT, unused "partial copy"
> ServerOptions copy constructor.
>
> I am not intimate with the affected code, so more work may be needed
> around this change: If the partial copy constructor was m
On 04/07/2016 03:22 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 7/04/2016 6:10 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> The attached patch removes broken and, AFAICT, unused "partial copy"
>> ServerOptions copy constructor.
> A (full) copy-constructor is needed on some systems for the clear()
> method implementation
On 8/04/2016 2:57 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:22 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 7/04/2016 6:10 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>> The attached patch removes broken and, AFAICT, unused "partial copy"
>>> ServerOptions copy constructor.
>
>
>> A (full) copy-constructor is needed o
On 04/09/2016 11:03 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 8/04/2016 2:57 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 03:22 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> On 7/04/2016 6:10 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
The attached patch removes broken and, AFAICT, unused "partial copy"
ServerOptions copy construc
