Hi,
oops. Forgot to post the attachment. Here goes.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Can we please have the patch clean again.. (preferably as a MIME
attachment). I don't seem to have the original message left in my
archives, and trying to recover the patch from the inline discussion is a
bit cumbersome
Just wondering if this belongs to Bug #796
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=796>. If it does
please attache the patch there and write a comment. Don't forget to get
the attributions correct if the patch is not uploaded by the author.
Regards
Henrik
> > On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, David
This is part of the same bug. The patch I just submitted from Gonzalo
is an improved fix for this problem.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Just wondering if this belongs to Bug #796
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=796>. If it does
please attache the patch there and write a comment. Don
Hi,
I am currently working on squid-3 support for Transfer-Encoding.
I need to estimate available cpu for compression, so that I can adjust
compression parameters.
The only function I found is src/stat.cc:statCPUUsage, which is declared
as static.
Should I:
1) make statCPUUsage public? (I guess
Hello,
Here's a patch for Squid ICAP 2.5 from CVS to add the X-Authenticated-User
header described in :
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stecher-icap-subid-00.txt
This mimics the X-Client-IP header to provide more information regarding
the original request to the ICAP server. It works
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Gonzalo A. Arana wrote:
> 1) make statCPUUsage public? (I guess this is the best).
> If so, I would need to know cpu usage with better resolution than 1
> minute. Is it possible (using squid API rather than system calls)?
Won't give you very accurate information anyway..
> 2)
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Gonzalo A. Arana wrote:
>
> > 1) make statCPUUsage public? (I guess this is the best).
> > If so, I would need to know cpu usage with better resolution than 1
> > minute. Is it possible (using squid API rather than system calls)?
>
> Won't give you very accurate informatio
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Gonzalo A. Arana wrote:
> Squid-3 does not have an API for running jobs asyncrhonously, right?
Not really no.
But if you limit yourself to platforms having threading support is is a
normal inter-thread message problem. To my knowledge all platforms have
threading support to
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 08:18, Gonzalo A. Arana wrote:
> > My instinctive reaction is to run the compression &
> > decompression in a separate thread. If the queue to the
> > compression/decompression engine is
> > large, decrease the compression level used.
>
> Good instinct :-)
> Squid-3 does n
