Re: Support for resolv.conf search and ndots

2005-04-18 Thread Thien Vu
Any chance of this being added in the main stable tree? Thien On 3/30/05, Thien Vu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's another go at it > > Thien > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:20:40 +0200 (CEST), Henrik Nordstrom > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Thien Vu wrote: > > > >

Re: Developer for IPv6 Squid patch.

2005-04-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote: Following rule 2, ("do never commmit anything directly in HEAD") It's more than a rule. It's enforced, and if you somehow manage to bypass the weak access controls then your changes will get automatically wiped out. HEAD at sourceforge is not th

Re: LFS Browser support

2005-04-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Serassio Guido wrote: Do they work when not configured to use the proxy? No, identical behaviour. Talked to some FireFox people and FireFox 1.1 will have support for giant files. Should already work in the nightly builds. In addition wget on Fedora Core apparently does suppor

Re: LFS Browser support

2005-04-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Joe Cooper wrote: Thanks, Henrik, for making sure it isn't Squid that's to blame! ;-) Not yet 100% there, but at least 99.99% done B) Regards Henrik

Re: LFS Browser support

2005-04-18 Thread Joe Cooper
Serassio Guido wrote: Hi Henrik, At 03.01 18/04/2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Serassio Guido wrote: It seems that the Mozilla and Internet Explorer doesn't support at all file bigger than 2 GB. Do they work when not configured to use the proxy? No, identical behaviour. Also

Re: LFS Browser support

2005-04-18 Thread Serassio Guido
Hi Henrik, At 03.01 18/04/2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Serassio Guido wrote: It seems that the Mozilla and Internet Explorer doesn't support at all file bigger than 2 GB. Do they work when not configured to use the proxy? No, identical behaviour. Regards Guido -