Remember that you must not change the type of headerp-shostid.
For IPv6 is should proboby be left blank, which is OK even in the IPv4
case (redundant unused field). See RFC2186 for details on the ICP message
format.
Hmm... A bit late, since I changed it at ICP.h
Now restoring...
Remember that you must not change the type of headerp-shostid.
For IPv6 is should proboby be left blank, which is OK even in the IPv4
case (redundant unused field). See RFC2186 for details on the ICP message
format.
Hmm... A bit late, since I changed it at ICP.h
Now
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
RFC2186 says nothing on IPv6:
Correct, but it defines the field as an 32-bit integer optional IPv4 host
address and this is still the case for IPv6.
In reality this field is a design error in the ICP protocol and should be
ignored for all
