On Thu, Apr 13, 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tor 2006-04-13 klockan 16:42 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
>
> > This should make squid retry the connection to the server. Is this what
> > it should do? Are there any documents outlining what the behaviour
> > "should" be?
>
> If the pinned server con
tor 2006-04-13 klockan 01:55 +1200 skrev Reuben Farrelly:
> Aside from that, I'm seriously in favour of anything which gets away from any
> sort of dependency on Sourceforge. The entire SF anoncvs access has been
> down
> for over a week with no indication of when it will be back, and this is
tor 2006-04-13 klockan 16:42 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
> This should make squid retry the connection to the server. Is this what
> it should do? Are there any documents outlining what the behaviour
> "should" be?
If the pinned server connection is gone Squid should abort the request
and close the
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006, nonama wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for your help. Can you let me know on other
> setting baseline that I should look into using the
> cache manager? i.e Select loop called" average time -
> should be under
> 20 milliseconds , in order for me to monitor my squid
> performance?
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I've found a problem with the connection pinning:
>
> 2006/04/13 11:50:25| fwdConnectStart: Pinned connection to
> mail.aiondiagnostics.com:80 gone, aborting request
> 2006/04/13 11:50:25| assertion failed: forward.c:114: "!EBIT_TEST(e->flags,
> ENTRY_
