On 5/22/06, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mån 2006-05-22 klockan 11:46 -0300 skrev Gonzalo Arana:
> Reordering and combining perhaps? Allowing combining would raise the
> number of cached entries invalidations from N-2 to (2**N)-2 (I am not
> counting current reply as an invalidat
mån 2006-05-22 klockan 20:15 -0300 skrev Gonzalo Arana:
> I know I may be wrong, but you mean that fuzzy cache should have
> different TTL/negTTL/cache_size for each level?
More like weight the entries differently and not just LRU...
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digita
On 5/22/06, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mån 2006-05-22 klockan 11:46 -0300 skrev Gonzalo Arana:
> Attached is the patch for:
> 1) external acl grace patch for squid 2.6, leaving 'level' for near (?)
future.
> 2) adds 'srcport', 'myaddr', and 'myport' acl tags.
Thanks! Commited.
mån 2006-05-22 klockan 11:46 -0300 skrev Gonzalo Arana:
> Attached is the patch for:
> 1) external acl grace patch for squid 2.6, leaving 'level' for near (?)
> future.
> 2) adds 'srcport', 'myaddr', and 'myport' acl tags.
Thanks! Commited.
Note: srcport doesn't make much sense to ues until the
On 05/18/2006-01:34AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> Remaining things:
>
> - epoll
Does the epoll work have an affect on the likelyhood of kqueue?
I'll add kqueue() support once squid-2.6 hits PRE and has had some testing.
It ain't difficult to add; I just want some testing to be done on the
current squid-2.6+epoll code before I rush in and change things to make
kqueue() and Solaris /dev/poll easier to implement.
On Mon, May 22, 2006, Henri
mån 2006-05-22 klockan 17:05 -0400 skrev Chris Weimann:
> Does the epoll work have an affect on the likelyhood of kqueue?
Not really no.
kqueue support is not a candidate for 2.6 as no squid-2.5 patch for
adding kqueue exists. The purpose of the Squid-2.6 release is to collect
already existing a
mån 2006-05-22 klockan 11:46 -0300 skrev Gonzalo Arana:
> Reordering and combining perhaps? Allowing combining would raise the
> number of cached entries invalidations from N-2 to (2**N)-2 (I am not
> counting current reply as an invalidation).
The big problem is the lookup, which we want to kee
tor 2006-05-18 klockan 01:59 +0200 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Just a question, (i've been quite busy those weeks to follow this ml), is the
> ICAP support already merged ? I'd like to help Christos if not
ICAP is currently not a candidate for merging into 2.6 as from what I
know the icap patch is
Either set up a new branch from squid-2.6, or submit it via squid-dev.
The latter is perhaps most suitable as it's a small feature ready for
immediate merge.
Attached is the patch for:
1) external acl grace patch for squid 2.6, leaving 'level' for near (?) future.
2) adds 'srcport', 'myaddr', an
10 matches
Mail list logo
