I've started tearing out the caching logic in storework-cutaway in SF.
I'm pretty certain as it stands objects are cached in memory but now
never actually used again by subsequent requests.
The code path that gets from the redirector/ACL checking logic through
to clientCacheHit() and
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 19:00 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Still exist problems in preview transaction between icap server and
squid. There are cases in which the squid-icap does not send the 0;
ieof sequence if all the http response body fits in the preview data
but
Hello,
I would like to give a try to the 2.6 branch of the ICAP patch and I
didn't manage to apply the patch available at:
http://devel.squid-cache.org/projects.html#icap
I tried on squid-2.6.STABLE9-20070220, squid-2.6.STABLE9 and
squid-2.6.STABLE8 without success.
Is there anywhere
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I won't be able to work on this for very long (university starts up again
next week) so could someone please give me a hand?
I've just ripped out clientCacheHit() and the Internal/Special object path.
The code in storework-cutaway now compiles and
Bonjour Jeremy,
Here is the answer I got, and I managed to patch squid correctly thanks
to it:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200702/0143.html
Would you have a corrected patch ?
Because I am applying manually and it is a bit long and not obvious to
not make a mistake.
Christophe Boyanique a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to give a try to the 2.6 branch of the ICAP patch and I
didn't manage to apply the patch available at:
http://devel.squid-cache.org/projects.html#icap
I tried on squid-2.6.STABLE9-20070220, squid-2.6.STABLE9 and
squid-2.6.STABLE8 without
to give a try to the 2.6 branch of the ICAP patch and I
didn't manage to apply the patch available at:
http://devel.squid-cache.org/projects.html#icap
I tried on squid-2.6.STABLE9-20070220, squid-2.6.STABLE9 and
squid-2.6.STABLE8 without success.
Is there anywhere:
- an history
