On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:25 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:58 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >> >
> >> > 1) "Prime candidates": Documented features that have at least one
> >> > developer or sponsor behind them, ready to commit time to fully
> >> develop
> >> > (i.e., write
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 13:11 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > Just got this to approve through the blog:
> >
> > - Forwarded message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:08:12 +
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:58 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> >
>> > 1) "Prime candidates": Documented features that have at least one
>> > developer or sponsor behind them, ready to commit time to fully
>> develop
>> > (i.e., write, test, document, commit, and provide initial support) the
>> > prop
> Hi,
>
> Here is patch so you can use port names from /etc/services in
> squid.conf for cache_peers like so:
> cache_peer upstream.example.net parent http-cache icpv2 \
> no-digest no-netdb-exchange
> assumng you have something like this in /etc/services
> http-cache 8080/tcp
> icpv2
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:58 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >
> > 1) "Prime candidates": Documented features that have at least one
> > developer or sponsor behind them, ready to commit time to fully develop
> > (i.e., write, test, document, commit, and provide initial support) the
> > proposed featu
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >>
> >> While you're at these Adrian, could you add -husni too please.
> >> I don't seem to have enough privileges at sourceforge to do it myself.
> >
> > Is that his username? "-husni" ?
> >
>
> No. As I r
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>> While you're at these Adrian, could you add -husni too please.
>> I don't seem to have enough privileges at sourceforge to do it myself.
>
> Is that his username? "-husni" ?
>
No. As I read that message its "aht2k".
Amos
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> Hmm, A few months ago, I was all for providing snapshots of squid3-ipv6
>> officially. With the closely pending 3.1 branch I don't exactly seen a
>> full need for it anymore. As its merged the separate snapshot would
>> become
>> just a mirror of 3.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Hmm, A few months ago, I was all for providing snapshots of squid3-ipv6
> officially. With the closely pending 3.1 branch I don't exactly seen a
> full need for it anymore. As its merged the separate snapshot would become
> just a mirror of 3.1-daily
T
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> While you're at these Adrian, could you add -husni too please.
> I don't seem to have enough privileges at sourceforge to do it myself.
Is that his username? "-husni" ?
Adrian
> Just got this to approve through the blog:
>
> - Forwarded message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:08:12 +
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [The Squid Web Proxy/Cache Blog] Please moderate:
While you're at these Adrian, could you add -husni too please.
I don't seem to have enough privileges at sourceforge to do it myself.
Amos
>
> Hi Amos,
>
> Would you add me as a developer so I can checkout the code?
> the username is aht2k
>
> thank you.
>
> -husni
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 19:16 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> > We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
>> > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASS
Good idea.
It would be nice if you could link to existing projects where
appropriate (e.g., on devel.squid-cache.org, or a changeset on HEAD).
There are a lot of interesting things in 2.6 HEAD, and their status
isn't clear.
Cheers,
On 2007/10/02, at 4:47 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hm, I'
> Hi Amos,
>
> At 23.14 01/10/2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> >
>> > Arg !!!
>> > I went crazy for 4 hours trying to understand a not-sense C++ build
>> > error . :-(
>>
>>Only 4 hours? man your lucky.
>>It took G. Panula and I a nasty few weeks to figure this one out.
>
> The error happens i
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>>> Hm, have you seen http://squid.sf.net/ ?
>> yes, I saw it. I was wondering if it's worth branching for such a
>> localized set of fixes, but it that's the preferred way I'll take it.
>> My sf id is
Hi,
Here is patch so you can use port names from /etc/services in
squid.conf for cache_peers like so:
cache_peer upstream.example.net parent http-cache icpv2 \
no-digest no-netdb-exchange
assumng you have something like this in /etc/services
http-cache 8080/tcp
icpv2 3130/udp
This
Hi Adrian,
As I can understand the support of squid2.6 (important bugs
correction, help at squid-users mailing list etc) will not stop the next
day the squid3 will be released.
But adding new features to squid2 is something different. At this time
1-2 of the most important squid developers spend
Just got this to approve through the blog:
- Forwarded message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:08:12 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [The Squid Web Proxy/Cache Blog] Please moderate: "Squid-2.6 IPv6
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 22:53 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> > > I'd like to hear from devs and interested users alike.
> >
> > I can only comment on Squid3 roadmap (should not the Squid2 roadmap end
> > soon after with Squid3 release?).
>
> There's st
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Hm, have you seen http://squid.sf.net/ ?
>
> yes, I saw it. I was wondering if it's worth branching for such a
> localized set of fixes, but it that's the preferred way I'll take it.
> My sf id is "andomasarati".
Updat
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > I'd like to hear from devs and interested users alike.
>
> I can only comment on Squid3 roadmap (should not the Squid2 roadmap end
> soon after with Squid3 release?).
There's still an enormous squid-2 userbase out there which still needs
to be look
Hi Henrik,
At 23.29 01/10/2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On mån, 2007-10-01 at 20:53 +0200, Guido Serassio wrote:
> Just upgraded autoconf and automake and now my development
> environment is broken: I cannot no more bootstrap squid . :-(
What happens?
Broken packages .
Just reverte
Hi Amos,
At 23.14 01/10/2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> Arg !!!
> I went crazy for 4 hours trying to understand a not-sense C++ build
> error . :-(
Only 4 hours? man your lucky.
It took G. Panula and I a nasty few weeks to figure this one out.
The error happens in MemPool.cc, so I have
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:47 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hm, I'm not sure if this made it to squid-core so I'm reposting it
> and to squid-dev this time.
>
> I've tidied up the Squid-2, Squid-3 and Squid roadmap entries in
> the Wiki:
>
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/RoadMap/
>
> I'd like:
>
> *
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 19:16 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
> > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNE
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > * Some feedback about the -2 and -3 roadmaps - especially since -2 is
> > mostly my ideal Squid-2 roadmap considering my own interests and
> > feedback from some Squid-2 users;
>
> Looks like the 3.x one needs a full re-write. In light of the cur
> Hm, I'm not sure if this made it to squid-core so I'm reposting it
> and to squid-dev this time.
>
> I've tidied up the Squid-2, Squid-3 and Squid roadmap entries in
> the Wiki:
>
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/RoadMap/
>
> I'd like:
>
> * Some feedback about the -2 and -3 roadmaps - especially si
28 matches
Mail list logo
