Re: 3.1 steps forward

2008-02-14 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > I'm just checking 3.1 progress maps now that the current big patches are in. > > Adrian: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/LogDaemon > >Can we add a timeline on this now please? > If it requires a push THN will provide a little funding to get

Re: 3.1 steps forward

2008-02-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
Adrian Chadd wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: I'm just checking 3.1 progress maps now that the current big patches are in. Adrian: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/LogDaemon Can we add a timeline on this now please? If it requires a push THN will provide a little fundin

Re: 3.1 steps forward

2008-02-14 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Sorry if I was obtuse. I meant that you are the expert on this one. Are > you able to re-locate that mysterious branch and estimate when you will > have time to sync and push it to HEAD? squid3_logdaemon have you fixed the AddrInfo leak? :) Adri

Re: squid3 future directory structure

2008-02-14 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 11:45 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SourceLayout > Added ICMP to your list of components. It's a clear-cut one now. Thank you. Can you lead this activity? We need somebody who will drive the discussion and oversee actual changes... >

eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Alex Rousskov
Hello, The Squid eCAP branch already has limited support for loadable modules. I have also written some eCAP-specific code, but I am not satisfied with its design yet. This may be the last opportunity to change things without rewriting a lot of code so I would love to get your feedback and ide

Squid Hardware

2008-02-14 Thread pokeman
well today my colleges are discuss about the caching their very long conversation their is 2 participants I am behalf of squid  and others are from BLUECOAT proxy sg hardware . well I am asking for squid developers there is any solution on hardware based embedded with squid today the marketing a

Re: X-Vary-Options patch

2008-02-14 Thread pokeman
can you please tell me how to apply this patch im using 2.6.18 we are getting error in my squid.log 2008/02/14 23:19:30| storeLocateVary: Not our vary marker object, F0B4F9361C107C816247C9D0B6B88927 = 'http://l.yimg.com/us.js.yimg.com/lib/bc/bc_2.0.4.js', 'accept-encoding="gzip,%20deflate"'/'-'

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:09 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: > Hello, > > The Squid eCAP branch already has limited support for loadable > modules. I have also written some eCAP-specific code, but I am not > satisfied with its design yet. This may be the last opportunity to > change things without

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:07 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:09 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > An eCAP loadable module needs to plug into Squid message processing > > pipeline, similar to how ICAP servers do that now, but without ICAP/TCP > > overheads. I see two design ch

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 15:57 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:07 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:09 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > > An eCAP loadable module needs to plug into Squid message processing > > > pipeline, similar to how ICAP servers do t

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
> Hello, > > The Squid eCAP branch already has limited support for loadable > modules. I have also written some eCAP-specific code, but I am not > satisfied with its design yet. This may be the last opportunity to > change things without rewriting a lot of code so I would love to get > your fee

Re: squid3 future directory structure

2008-02-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 11:45 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SourceLayout > >> Added ICMP to your list of components. It's a clear-cut one now. > > Thank you. Can you lead this activity? We need somebody who will drive > the discussion and oversee actual cha

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 10:12 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > What I meant was that when an eCAP module needs (say) DNS access, > there will be someone looking at the ease of use of the DNS interface > in squid. And just that act will provide some pressure to improve > things. With option #1 (expos

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I imagine the basic first-signup users of eCAP will be wanting to > perform content-filters on pages as they arrive. That only needs a > read-only buffer of the page data and a hook to allow/deny the > transaction. FWIW, some of the users

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
> > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> I imagine the basic first-signup users of eCAP will be wanting to >> perform content-filters on pages as they arrive. That only needs a >> read-only buffer of the page data and a hook to allow/deny the >> transaction. > > FWIW, some of

Re: Squid Hardware

2008-02-14 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008, pokeman wrote: > well today my colleges are discuss about the caching their very long > conversation their is 2 participants I am behalf of squid ??? and others are > from BLUECOAT proxy sg hardware . well I am asking for squid developers > there is any solution on hardware b

Re: eCAP: expose Squid or link with eCAP lib?

2008-02-14 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I'd choose (3). Some of the basic types have clean headers already. > Is it possible to incrementally grow eCAP access to the internals of > squid? Starting with, ie just a buffer of page text, and work the API up? > I mean, we publish the available cl

Re: squid3 future directory structure

2008-02-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:24 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > >> 6) Should directory names use just_small, CamelCase, or CAPS > letters? > >> > >> I Think CamelCase like we do for files and classes, with acroynms > being > >> upper case is working. When we can make the converted and re-used > legac