On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 10:54 +, Tony Dodd wrote:
This is a test e-mail, as I'm fairly sure that something is broken with
the exchange mail server that I'm now being made to use. Thus far, I
haven't received any squid-dev e-mails since the change-over, so this
is just a test to make sure
This is a test e-mail, as I'm fairly sure that something is broken with
the exchange mail server that I'm now being made to use. Thus far, I
haven't received any squid-dev e-mails since the change-over, so this
is just a test to make sure it's working. Please ignore!
Thanks
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:41 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'd suggest just disabling COSS in -3 until someone ports over the changes
or replaces it with something better.
This was even decided on for the 3.0 release, but never done as
Squid-3.0 didn't for from HEAD until very late in the release
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 03:34 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Can someone please explain the logic behind this?
I think I understand, but I'd like to know what people are trying
to achieve.
The overall goal is robustness: make production Squid
