On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:23 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I found that in 3.x as well. It turns out those bits of valgrind code
only occur if both --enable-leakfinder and --with-valgrind-debug are
enabled.
My test script only had --with-valgrind which wasn't doing even the
job it needed
Hello,
Should I use the same debugging sections for ICAP, eCAP, and the
code they share? Or should we have three distinct debugging sections for
those three areas?
Thank you,
Alex.
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:29 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
The following page has been changed by Amos Jeffries:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SourceLayout?action=diffrev2=9rev1=8
Original:
Question: Can we remove Foo prefix from
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 00:18 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
1) I convert most of the tunnel.cc to new asyncCalls/CommCalls
interface. It looks that works very well (setting the assert_burst_max I
am able to completely bypass the bug #2253).
If there is not any objection I will commit the
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Sorry if I was obtuse. I meant that you are the expert on this one. Are
you able to re-locate that mysterious branch and estimate when you will
have time to sync and push it to HEAD?
squid3_logdaemon
have you fixed the AddrInfo
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 20:37 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
You can ignore that. If you care that much about the epoll error then
just bzero() the data being passed into epoll_ctl() before its called.
I care about every potential
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:34 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Robert Henrik,
Some of us have found a knowledge-hole in the bzr revert process.
We can easily reverse a patch using for example:
bzr revert -r 8902
But then when its fixed we don't know how to undo the undo.
The local
Replace a URN handling set of gotos' with a sub-function.
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# target_branch: file:///src/squid/bzr/cleanup/
# testament_sha1: 23ceddad39c635fcb80fa6d71378c39220fb9f2a
# timestamp: 2008-03-25 13:13:05 +1200
#
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Alex Rousskov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Should I use the same debugging sections for ICAP, eCAP, and the
code they share? Or should we have three distinct debugging sections for
those three areas?
IMO the most intuitive approach would be to have
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:34 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Robert Henrik,
Some of us have found a knowledge-hole in the bzr revert process.
We can easily reverse a patch using for example:
bzr revert -r 8902
I prefer using merge.
bzr merge -r 8903..8902
to undo revision 8903.
that
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 11:29 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I missed that email from you.
I don't see any huge problems with that approach, as long as we make
sure its kept to.
Same here, except for some minor human confusion about which file is
really meant when someone says just file.h.
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 22:14 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
Should I use the same debugging sections for ICAP, eCAP, and the
code they share? Or should we have three distinct debugging sections for
those three areas?
I think using the same is appropriate, unless you think there will be a
need
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hello,
Should I use the same debugging sections for ICAP, eCAP, and the
code they share? Or should we have three distinct debugging sections for
those three areas?
I think 2 areas for the unique code at least. Preferrably numerically close.
How much of the shared
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:23 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I found that in 3.x as well. It turns out those bits of valgrind code
only occur if both --enable-leakfinder and --with-valgrind-debug are
enabled.
My test script only had --with-valgrind which wasn't doing even
Is there any way to get this stuff to post an actual diff rather than
this bundle?
Adrian
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Replace a URN handling set of gotos' with a sub-function.
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# target_branch:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:04 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
'bzr revert' changes the working tree to be the same as a given revision
[with optional file list].
If you then do a commit - e.g:
bzr revert -r X
bzr commit
you are committing a changeset that happens to alter previously done
work,
bb:comment
patch looks very empty..
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 13:13 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Replace a URN handling set of gotos' with a sub-function.
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:23 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Is it valgrind being wrong, or does epoll actually read from that
unitinitialised region?
it's valgrind not knowing (or caring about) the full details of when
epoll uses what of the supplied data.
But generally speaking it's a good
Robert?
Should I go ahead and set up the needed accounts?
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 14:33 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 14:30 -0600, Bundle Buggy wrote:
Submitter Alex Rousskov [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not
have voting rights
Nope.
Alex.
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:33 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I've been thinking it would be a good idea to add the patch-cleaning
script to the source for people to use for submission. There are a few
minor issues to work out still but if you all agree I'll drop it in.
Is this the script we
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is there any way to get this stuff to post an actual diff rather than
this bundle?
It does. This one tried to also as you see below.
Watchout for this one guys. Committing the patch to trunk before using
bzr to submit the diff for bundlebuggy results in an empty patch
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:33 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I've been thinking it would be a good idea to add the patch-cleaning
script to the source for people to use for submission. There are a few
minor issues to work out still but if you all agree I'll drop it in.
Is
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:28 +0100, Kinkie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Alex Rousskov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I use the same debugging sections for ICAP, eCAP, and the
code they share? Or should we have three distinct debugging sections for
those three areas?
IMO
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 01:45 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
My current version:
Cleans the ~N~ files created during merge.
Why? There may be important backups there from earlier reverts run by
the user..
Cleans the automake files out of the submitted patch
Ok I think, but complex and not
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 21:21 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is there any way to get this stuff to post an actual diff rather than
this bundle?
It's there.
But I think something was wrong with amos submission. Looks very empty
with a 0 lines patch and very small bundle..
Regards
Revision 8905:
src/comm.cc: In function 'int comm_connect_addr(int, const IPAddress)':
src/comm.cc:1144: warning: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 2 of
'void* memset(void*, int, size_t)'
make[1]: *** [comm.lo] Error 1
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Revision 8905:
src/comm.cc: In function 'int comm_connect_addr(int, const IPAddress)':
src/comm.cc:1144: warning: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 2 of
'void* memset(void*, int, size_t)'
make[1]: *** [comm.lo] Error 1
What compiler are you using for this?
Amos
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 01:45 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
My current version:
Cleans the ~N~ files created during merge.
Why? There may be important backups there from earlier reverts run by
the user..
I found 'bzr revert -r submit: cfgaux/*' failed with an error
I think its probably time we added aufs as one of the available default
filesystems.
Comments?
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:57 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hello,
From http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2275:
User: squid-3.0.STABLE2 compile error.
Troubleshooter: Where did you get this 3.0.STABLE2 tree?
User: squid-3.0.STABLE2-20080319.tar.gz
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:33 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I've been thinking it would be a good idea to add the patch-cleaning
script to the source for people to use for submission. There are a
few
minor issues to work out still but if you all agree I'll drop it in.
FWIW I'd really rather
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 13:04 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:04 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
'bzr revert' changes the working tree to be the same as a given revision
[with optional file list].
If you then do a commit - e.g:
bzr revert -r X
bzr commit
you are
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:08 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:33 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I've been thinking it would be a good idea to add the patch-cleaning
script to the source for people to use for submission. There are a
few minor issues to work out still
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 13:09 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Robert?
Should I go ahead and set up the needed accounts?
turbogears seems broken on squid-cache.org at the moment, until I figure
out what has changed, noone can add accounts.
-Rob
--
GPG key available at:
34 matches
Mail list logo
