Hi Robert,
At 08.17 26/06/2008, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:10 +0200, Guido Serassio wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> >
> >There is and it works fine for many windows users. However some using
> >problematic toolchains like Visual Studio have more needs than just
> >checking out the cod
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:10 +0200, Guido Serassio wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> >
> >There is and it works fine for many windows users. However some using
> >problematic toolchains like Visual Studio have more needs than just
> >checking out the code - they need file mangling. And that is very close
> >to
Hi Robert,
At 05.15 26/06/2008, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:21 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 2008/6/25 Guido Serassio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Please also add the Windows support to the list, still totally broken and
> > still without any usable VCS on Windows .
>
> There
Hi Amos,
At 04.20 26/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Guido Serassio wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
> At 13.40 25/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> Priorities are fine, but having some actual long-term directions to
>>> fit these features into a roadmap will make much more sense.
>>> Personally, I think you g
Hi Adrian,
At 02.21 26/06/2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
2008/6/25 Guido Serassio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please also add the Windows support to the list, still totally broken and
> still without any usable VCS on Windows .
There isn't a bzr implementation for Windows? Its just python, isn't it?
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:21 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 2008/6/25 Guido Serassio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Please also add the Windows support to the list, still totally broken and
> > still without any usable VCS on Windows .
>
> There isn't a bzr implementation for Windows? Its just pytho
Guido Serassio wrote:
Hi Amos,
At 13.40 25/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Priorities are fine, but having some actual long-term directions to
fit these features into a roadmap will make much more sense.
Personally, I think you guys should consider fixing or reverting
whatever stuff is in Squid-3
Kinkie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
- Priority sorted list of things we'd like to see get done.
Kinkie: can we sort a list based on the number pulled from a regex line
match?
Doable with an extension I've written
On tor, 2008-06-26 at 08:21 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> There isn't a bzr implementation for Windows? Its just python, isn't it?
It runs on Windows, but it doesn't perform any line ending
transformations, and Windows tools doesn't like UNIX line endings, just
as UNIX tools doesn't like to see Wi
2008/6/25 Guido Serassio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please also add the Windows support to the list, still totally broken and
> still without any usable VCS on Windows .
There isn't a bzr implementation for Windows? Its just python, isn't it?
I'd like to see Squid-2 turned into a more sensible V
The attached patch makes mgr:idns show a bit more detail about the
queue.
And one more thing to check in the cachemgr data.
squidclient mgr:events | grep idns
do that give you a idnsCheckQueue entry? (it should, when there is
entries in the queue...)
Note: the test above does not require the
On ons, 2008-06-25 at 21:53 +0100, Bradley Kite wrote:
> Internal DNS Statistics:
>
> The Queue:
>DELAY SINCE
> ID SIZE SENDS FIRST SEND LAST SEND
> -- - -- -
> 0x2dd7 39 2597011 40711.226 0.002
> 0x10ec 40 2597905 42519.743 0.
On ons, 2008-06-25 at 01:42 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> 2.7.STABLE3 has been rolled and is available for test. Unless some
> problem is found it will be signed, linked and pushed out to the ftp
> mirrors tomorrow (later today...)
>
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.7/squid-2.7.STABL
On 25/06/2008, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On ons, 2008-06-25 at 22:28 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> > Could be, and that missing cachemgr page I mentioned would show if this
> > is the case..
>
>
> Actually it's already implemented. Silly me.
>
> squidclient mgr:idns
>
>
On ons, 2008-06-25 at 22:28 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Could be, and that missing cachemgr page I mentioned would show if this
> is the case..
Actually it's already implemented. Silly me.
squidclient mgr:idns
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
On ons, 2008-06-25 at 21:10 +0100, Bradley Kite wrote:
> This server had traffic disabled for at least 30 minutes, so any
> "pending" DNS lookups should have definitely failed/timed-out by the
> time I got the debug.
Ok, THAT is an important hint.
> Maybe its possible that somehow these DNS look
On 25/06/2008, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On ons, 2008-06-25 at 12:30 +0100, Bradley Kite wrote:
> > I dont know the code that well but if the entry is not in the ipcache,
> > then how can idnsCachedLookup return true?
>
>
> This happens if there is already a pending matching p
On ons, 2008-06-25 at 12:30 +0100, Bradley Kite wrote:
> I dont know the code that well but if the entry is not in the ipcache,
> then how can idnsCachedLookup return true?
This happens if there is already a pending matching pending DNS lookup.
The idns cache is a cache of pending DNS lookups, not
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> - Priority sorted list of things we'd like to see get done.
>>
>
> Kinkie: can we sort a list based on the number pulled from a regex line
> match?
Doable with an extension I've written
(http://
Hi Amos,
At 13.40 25/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Priorities are fine, but having some actual long-term directions to
fit these features into a roadmap will make much more sense.
Personally, I think you guys should consider fixing or reverting
whatever stuff is in Squid-3.HEAD right this second
2008/6/25 Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We should be using "release often" strategy, which means making a new
> release whenever sufficient amount of new features or stable
> restructuring of code is completed. In such strategy road maps is merely
> a wish list, what actually gets into t
2008/6/25 Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Personally, I think you guys should consider fixing or reverting
>> whatever stuff is in Squid-3.HEAD right this second which causes
>> instability and release Squid-3.1.
>
> :-) Oh I'd love too...
>
> There's nothing in there right now thats inheren
Adrian Chadd wrote:
2008/6/25 Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We should be using "release often" strategy, which means making a new
release whenever sufficient amount of new features or stable
restructuring of code is completed. In such strategy road maps is merely
a wish list, what actua
On 24/06/2008, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tis 2008-06-24 klockan 22:50 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
>
> > The question is - why is Squid not timing the client-facing filedescriptors
> > out? Is there some pending reply which isn't being written back correctly?
>
>
> Good question.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On ons, 2008-06-25 at 16:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I definitely need to see it operating in some 3.1 release (for
commercial reasons). If there are no objections I'd like to move it from
the initial release list, but reserve the commit to a later release of
3.1. S
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On ons, 2008-06-25 at 16:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> I definitely need to see it operating in some 3.1 release (for
>> commercial reasons). If there are no objections I'd like to move it from
>> the initial rele
On ons, 2008-06-25 at 16:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> I definitely need to see it operating in some 3.1 release (for
> commercial reasons). If there are no objections I'd like to move it from
> the initial release list, but reserve the commit to a later release of
> 3.1. So that its no long
27 matches
Mail list logo
