Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Finally got around to running it myself on just src/*.*
For me md5checker detects bungled files. I haven't looked further than
those files to see if other directories are bunged as well.
md5checker.sh assures us the printable byte order is iden
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Finally got around to running it myself on just src/*.*
For me md5checker detects bungled files. I haven't looked further than
those files to see if other directories are bunged as well.
md5checker.sh assures us the printable byte order is identical, yes?
This script j
Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Hi Amos,
I had post the latest version of the formatter (plus a small script
for checking md5 signatures):
http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-dev@squid-cache.org/msg07208.html
In all test I run, worked without problems.
I think it is OK.
Regards,
Christos
Adrian Chadd wrote:
2008/9/13 Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This one was easy and isolated, so I went and did it early.
It's back-compatible, so people don't have to use the new names if they
like. But its clearer for the newbies until the big cleanup you mention
below is stable.
Well, t
2008/9/13 Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This one was easy and isolated, so I went and did it early.
> It's back-compatible, so people don't have to use the new names if they
> like. But its clearer for the newbies until the big cleanup you mention
> below is stable.
Well, the newbies still
Amos Jeffries has voted reject.
Status is now: Vetoed
Comment:
I see a potential critical bug in hunk #4: if(!vc) vc->ns
For details, see:
http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/squid/request/%3C1220137897.6703.4.camel%40henriknordstrom.net%3E
Project: Squid
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Following some detailed discussion around the AsyncCalls issues and why
it blocks 3.1 release we have come to the point of withdrawing the
current implementation.
With one conditional; if during the reversal TMF can complete and
satisfy the rest of the developers that the
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Amos, why are you pushing through changes to the WCCP configuration
stuff at this point in the game?
All the magic numbers in the squid.conf have been bugging me for a
while. There seems to have been a renewed interest in getting WCCP
configs right since Tproxy v4 stuff we
Amos Jeffries has voted approve.
Status is now: Semi-approved
For details, see:
http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/squid/request/%3C48CA2AD1.4020901%40treenet.co.nz%3E
Project: Squid
