All expected operational features are now in or about to go into trunk.
I'm going to start the 3.1 branch sequence shortly.
As a part of this action, the major part of source code re-format will
take place. Which is expected to cause patch clashes. If you are aware
of bug patches needing to go
Guido Serassio wrote:
Hi Amos,
At 04.19 03/10/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Kinkie wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Can we please rename ntlm_auth to ntlm_smb_auth in the 3.1 release?
>>>
>>> Having this helper name
On lör, 2008-10-04 at 19:15 +0200, Kinkie wrote:
> ...which is exactly what I was suggesting at the beginning of this thread.
> For rproxy scenarios, global_internal_static should cover the cases
> Mark is worried about.
> The only doubt I may have is how to best express access control (the
> curr
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On lör, 2008-10-04 at 08:22 +0200, Kinkie wrote:
>
>> We already are, see /squid-internal-static, cache digests and friends.
>> Rather than configuring a different port/interface I'd prefer making
>> the access path confi
On lör, 2008-10-04 at 08:22 +0200, Kinkie wrote:
> We already are, see /squid-internal-static, cache digests and friends.
> Rather than configuring a different port/interface I'd prefer making
> the access path configurable (/squid-internal-*)
Well.. not really. See global_internal_static directi
Been a week now, no other comments or issues on the test Squid.
Merged.
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE4 or 3.0.STABLE9
