Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
I'm neutral on this. Chris, the what that Robert talks about is what I had originally thought, but I'm not dead-set either way... On 05/05/2009, at 12:25 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:17 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: The functionality? Very much so; I've been thinking

Re: Status of Squid 3 on Windows

2009-05-05 Thread Kinkie
Hi all, I've also planned hosting a shared windows dev system on eu, but we need to secure the necessary OS and devkit licenses first. On Monday, May 4, 2009, Guido Serassio guido.seras...@acmeconsulting.it wrote: Hi Alex, Il 02.13 04/05/2009 Alex Rousskov ha scritto: Hi Guido,    

[PATCH] helper closing sequence cleanup

2009-05-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
This one will definitely need a review and second opinion. While looking over the helper shutdown sequence to investigate bug 2648. If I understand it now the two states for end-of-life are: - shutdown :: closure is needed, but for some reason it can't be done immediately. - closing ::

Re: [PATCH] helper closing sequence cleanup

2009-05-05 Thread Bundle Buggy
Bundle Buggy has detected this merge request. For details, see: http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/squid/request/%3C4A003331.1050406%40treenet.co.nz%3E Project: Squid

Re: Status of Squid 3 on Windows

2009-05-05 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 05/05/2009 12:51 AM, Kinkie wrote: I've also planned hosting a shared windows dev system on eu, but we need to secure the necessary OS and devkit licenses first. Securing somebody who will be working on that windows dev system should come first, I guess. If nobody is going to be

Re: [PATCH] helper closing sequence cleanup

2009-05-05 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 05/05/2009 06:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: This one will definitely need a review and second opinion. While looking over the helper shutdown sequence to investigate bug 2648. If I understand it now the two states for end-of-life are: - shutdown :: closure is needed, but for some reason

Re: [PATCH] helper closing sequence cleanup

2009-05-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
Alex Rousskov wrote: On 05/05/2009 06:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: This one will definitely need a review and second opinion. While looking over the helper shutdown sequence to investigate bug 2648. If I understand it now the two states for end-of-life are: - shutdown :: closure is needed,

Re: [PATCH] helper closing sequence cleanup

2009-05-05 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 05/05/2009 04:49 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Alex Rousskov wrote: Can we remove flags.closing and rely on the corresponding wfd state instead? Is wfd always set to -1 when we set flags.closing to 1? Did I not comment that some closures are rfd closed first, others are wfd closed? The