On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:39:18 -0500, Matthew Morgan
wrote:
> Here is the patch to add acl support to range_offset_limit. It is being
> parsed using the same data types as reply_body_max_size, which means the
> limit value gets run through parseBytesLine64, and the acl is optional.
> If people
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:03:33 +0530, Dhaval Varia
wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I am very enthu to work on this problem.but i am new in this.
>
> can you please help me initially.so i can understand flow of SQUID.
>
> and also understand code which is related to this problem.
>
> Please Answer me few
Hello,
HTTP compliance results for Squid 3.0.23, 3.1.16, and trunk r10264
have been uploaded to http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/HTTP11
We tried to preserve the old results intact for this update and just
added new stuff. Going forward, we will polish the spreadsheet and
probably remove o
Here is the patch to add acl support to range_offset_limit. It is being
parsed using the same data types as reply_body_max_size, which means the
limit value gets run through parseBytesLine64, and the acl is optional.
If people are using the old global style of range_offset_limit, they
shouldn
