Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #698

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3/698/changes Changes: [Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz] Fix fake NTLM auth symbol clash on ERR/OK macros [Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com] Compliance: Forward multiple unknown HTTP Cache-Control directives.

3.2.0.0 Beta sources not available

There is a link to 3.2 Beta from Squid downloads but tarball is not there: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.2/squid-3.2.0.0.tar.gz Thank you! J

Re: 3.2.0.0 Beta sources not available

Jenny Lee wrote: There is a link to 3.2 Beta from Squid downloads but tarball is not there: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.2/squid-3.2.0.0.tar.gz Thank you! J Oh thanks. That should not have been a visible link yet. There is no formal signed bundle as yet. Amos -- Please

Re: 3.2.0.0 Beta sources not available

Jenny Lee wrote: There is a link to 3.2 Beta from Squid downloads but tarball is not there: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.2/squid-3.2.0.0.tar.gz Thank you! J Oh thanks. That should not have been a visible link yet. There is no formal signed bundle as yet. Amos Hello Amos,

Hudson build is back to normal: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #699

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3/699/changes

Hudson build is back to normal: 3.HEAD-i386-opensolaris #375

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-i386-opensolaris/375/changes

Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-i386-opensolaris-SunStudioCc #337

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-i386-opensolaris-SunStudioCc/337/changes Changes: [Amos Jeffries amosjeffr...@squid-cache.org] typo [Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz] Fix fake NTLM auth symbol clash on ERR/OK macros [Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com] Compliance:

Re: --enable-disk-io default is not auto?

That code block should not be executed if the option is not specified. In theory it should work as advertised. What is the check that's failing to you? Kinkie (on mobile, can't commit but can comment ;) ) I'm putting the finishing touches to autoconf-refactor on a local branch, in a few days

[MERGE] Fixed missing test command when testing OS

Please find attached very minor patch for configure.in # Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90) # revision_id: a...@andybev.com-20100731150544-p9g5vwcakwomkug9 # target_branch: file:///home/andrew/squid-repo/trunk/ # testament_sha1: acdd91fe4f43f7f08ff31f224b583c5310f8398c # timestamp:

Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-i386-opensolaris-SunStudioCc #338

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-i386-opensolaris-SunStudioCc/338/changes Changes: [Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz] Hack: define top_build_prefix for old autotools This hack was removed during the libtool 2.2 upgrade. The issue shows up as bundle builds failing to link

Build failed in Hudson: 3.0-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #62

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.0-amd64-CentOS-5.3/62/changes Changes: [Amos Jeffries amosjeffr...@squid-cache.org] Author: Matthias Pitzl silam...@coronamundi.de Bug 2991: Wrong parameters to fcntl() in commSetCloseOnExec() [Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz] Author: Xavier Redon

[MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

I'd like to propose the attached patch, to rename the build option --enable-linux-netfilter to --enable-nf-transparent. This is for 2 reasons: 1. It is consistent with the remainder of the transparent proxy options (ifpw-transparent, ipf-transparent, pf-transparent). 2. It causes less confusion

Re: [MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

Andrew Beverley wrote: I'd like to propose the attached patch, to rename the build option --enable-linux-netfilter to --enable-nf-transparent. This is for 2 reasons: 1. It is consistent with the remainder of the transparent proxy options (ifpw-transparent, ipf-transparent, pf-transparent). 2.

Re: [MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

Also, would you mind waiting until autoconf-refactor lands to trunk? It is a largish change, and changing trunk now would make merging harder. If all goes right, I'll submit a merge candidate on Friday for review, and if there's no issues I hope to merge next Sunday.. Thanks! On 8/1/10, Amos