Re: Squid 3.2 performance question

2012-03-21 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 22.03.2012 07:06, Henrik Nordström wrote: ons 2012-03-21 klockan 12:32 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: The UDS packets comes to mind, but that is a different PF_* family type. I stopped looking at that point. It could be the packet MARK lookups which are done through libnetfilter-*. I have very

Re: [squid-users] Roadmap Squid 3.2

2012-03-21 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Hello, I was able to test this : squid 3.2.0.16, basic_ldap_auth, running on a Solaris 10 x86 box. I tested '#' '|' '(' and ')' and it worked fine. I can't use UTF-8 and accentuated chars (é, à, ç, ...) as our LDAP (in fact, the passwd change interface) doesn't accept these kind of characte

Re: Squid 3.2 performance question

2012-03-21 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2012-03-21 klockan 12:32 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: > The UDS packets comes to mind, but that is a different PF_* family > type. I stopped looking at that point. > > It could be the packet MARK lookups which are done through > libnetfilter-*. I have very little idea how that library works

Re: Squid 3.2 performance question

2012-03-21 Thread Alexander Komyagin
OK, here are more results we got so far.. Squid 3.2.0.7 and 3.2.0.8 don't show any significant performance downgrade in my configuration (however, without RSBAC-Net both run slightly faster). But Squid 3.2.0.10 and 3.2.0.11 has that downgrade just like 3.2.0.16. Unfortunately 3.2.0.9 doesn't work

Re: Squid 3.2 performance question

2012-03-21 Thread Alexander Komyagin
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 10:56 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 03/20/2012 06:14 AM, Alexander Komyagin wrote: > By comparing oprofile results for 3.2 with and w/o RSBAC-Net, I can > assume that RSBAC-Net subsystem performs some internal operations on > list structures, which are indeed