3.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:36:47AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Diego Woitasen (Lanux) wrote:
>
> > Sorry, but... Is my patch OK?
>
> Almost.
>
> To be consistent with the other max_... acls (maxconn, max_user_ip) the
> condition should be i
gets merged then the old request_body_max_size should obviously
> be depreated in favor of the acl approach.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
--
Diego Woitasen
LANUX
This patch add a new ACL type: max_body_size. This will be matched when
the client's HTTP request body is greater than X bytes.
Example:
acl users max_body_size 10
Comments and suggestions are welcome...
diff -Nur squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040208/src/acl.c
squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040208-diegows
This patch add a new ACL type: max_body_size. This will be matched when
the client's HTTP request body is greater than X bytes.
Example:
acl users max_body_size 10
Comments and suggestions are welcome...
diff -Nur squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040208/src/acl.c
squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040208-diegows/s
parent-sibling relatioship?
Thanks?!
--
Diego Woitasen
LANUX
In cf.data.pre, what's the difference between DEFAULT and
DEFAULT_IF_NONE?
This is the patch (indent 1.9.1) and apply to squid-2.5 CVS.
Changes:
-support for bogus clients in authentication, forcing the use
of some scheme for some clients with acls.
-authenticateAuthSchemeConfigure() renamed to
authenticateAuthSchemeActive
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 07:38:00AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 01:18, Diego Woitasen wrote:
> > This patch add 3 switch to acl proxy_auth to force a authentication
> > scheme to bogus clients, like IE and Messenger (see squid.conf help).
> >
> > Please somebody can check t
