On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 13:11 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > Just got this to approve through the blog:
> >
> > - Forwarded message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:08:12 +
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> Hmm, A few months ago, I was all for providing snapshots of squid3-ipv6
>> officially. With the closely pending 3.1 branch I don't exactly seen a
>> full need for it anymore. As its merged the separate snapshot would
>> become
>> just a mirror of 3.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Hmm, A few months ago, I was all for providing snapshots of squid3-ipv6
> officially. With the closely pending 3.1 branch I don't exactly seen a
> full need for it anymore. As its merged the separate snapshot would become
> just a mirror of 3.1-daily
T
> Just got this to approve through the blog:
>
> - Forwarded message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:08:12 +
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [The Squid Web Proxy/Cache Blog] Please moderate:
Just got this to approve through the blog:
- Forwarded message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:08:12 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [The Squid Web Proxy/Cache Blog] Please moderate: "Squid-2.6 IPv6
