Re: [RFC] COSS removal from 3.0

2008-09-08 Thread Amos Jeffries
Amos Jeffries wrote: I'm expecting to roll 3.0.STABLE9 sometime over the next 5 days. One update still to be done is the removal of COSS. I had planned on just dead-coding (disabling) it. But with the configure recursion being dynamic thats not easily possible. I'm currently considering

Re: [RFC] COSS removal from 3.0

2008-09-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 01:46 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: I'm expecting to roll 3.0.STABLE9 sometime over the next 5 days. One update still to be done is the removal of COSS. I had planned on just dead-coding (disabling) it. But with the configure recursion being dynamic thats not easily

Re: [RFC] COSS removal from 3.0

2008-09-05 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 23:12 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 01:46 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: I'm expecting to roll 3.0.STABLE9 sometime over the next 5 days. One update still to be done is the removal of COSS. I had planned on just dead-coding (disabling) it. But

Re: [RFC] COSS removal from 3.0

2008-09-04 Thread Adrian Chadd
2008/9/4 Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm expecting to roll 3.0.STABLE9 sometime over the next 5 days. One update still to be done is the removal of COSS. I had planned on just dead-coding (disabling) it. But with the configure recursion being dynamic thats not easily possible. I'm

Re: [RFC] COSS removal from 3.0

2008-09-04 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 01:46 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: I'm expecting to roll 3.0.STABLE9 sometime over the next 5 days. One update still to be done is the removal of COSS. I had planned on just dead-coding (disabling) it. But with the configure recursion being dynamic thats not easily