Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-30 Thread Guido Serassio
Hi Steven, At 07.21 30/07/2006, Steven wrote: I have just found another bug. I have ended up in the situation where squid has not stared the diskd processes (because the binary is called diskd-daemon not diskd_daemon). Squid is not serving any web pages, and will not stop because of this,

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-30 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
sön 2006-07-30 klockan 09:56 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio: I think that likely you have found the problem look the log attached to this Squid bug on Debian opened by the same people: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380020 2006/07/26 16:52:21| ipcCreate:

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-30 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
sön 2006-07-30 klockan 09:56 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio: 2006/07/26 16:52:21| ipcCreate: /usr/lib/squid/diskd_daemon: (2) No such file or directory A quite large but nonintrusive patch applied to detect this early, refusing to start at all. The problem seems to be into ipcCreate(): Yes and

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-29 Thread Steven
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Looked at it breafly, but ran out of ideas. http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 Regards Henrik I could reproduce the bug if I had a COSS cache_dir enabled without any aufs cache_dirs. I've updated the bug with a patch to

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-29 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
lör 2006-07-29 klockan 18:05 +0800 skrev Steven: I could reproduce the bug if I had a COSS cache_dir enabled without any aufs cache_dirs. I've updated the bug with a patch to fix this scenario. I think the COSS issue is separate. Based on your patch that problem should be seen immediately on

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-29 Thread Steven
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: l??r 2006-07-29 klockan 18:05 +0800 skrev Steven: I could reproduce the bug if I had a COSS cache_dir enabled without any aufs cache_dirs. I've updated the bug with a patch to fix this scenario. I think the COSS issue is separate. Based on

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-29 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
lör 2006-07-29 klockan 23:16 +0800 skrev Steven: I was seeing the msgrecv() calls while running strace, but it wasn't in the same loop as reported in the bug. Looks like I just found another bug while trying to reproduce this one :) Was not aware there was msgrcv() calls in pthreads. We

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-29 Thread Steven
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: l??r 2006-07-29 klockan 23:16 +0800 skrev Steven: I was seeing the msgrecv() calls while running strace, but it wasn't in the same loop as reported in the bug. Looks like I just found another bug while trying to reproduce this one :) Was

Re: Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-29 Thread Steven
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: l??r 2006-07-29 klockan 23:16 +0800 skrev Steven: I was seeing the msgrecv() calls while running strace, but it wasn't in the same loop as reported in the bug. Looks like I just found another bug while trying to reproduce this one :) Was

Any takers on Bug #1703? (diskd stuck at 100% CPU)

2006-07-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Looked at it breafly, but ran out of ideas. http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel