Re: Cleanup patches to follow

2008-09-12 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 23:42 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > If the code is committed, I will go through affected bug reports (that I > know of) and update or close them. Done. If I missed any affected bugs, please point me to them. > Finally, I am aware of one unreported(?) problem related to the

Re: Cleanup patches to follow

2008-09-11 Thread Amos Jeffries
Alex Rousskov wrote: On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 23:42 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: I am going to post a few [MERGE] requests after this email. Done. I hope I did not forget anything. Separating changes into individual [MERGE] requests was rather painful -- I had to create a separate bzr branch

Re: Cleanup patches to follow

2008-09-11 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 23:42 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > I am going to post a few [MERGE] requests after this email. Done. I hope I did not forget anything. Separating changes into individual [MERGE] requests was rather painful -- I had to create a separate bzr branch for each submit (there

Cleanup patches to follow

2008-09-10 Thread Alex Rousskov
Hello, I am going to post a few [MERGE] requests after this email. In aggregate, they fix all critical and reported Comm and AsyncCall segfault- and assertion-causing problems that I am aware of. The cleaned up code works in my lab tests and on one live IRCache node. I think it should be commi